| Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
05-10-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2012
Posts: 50
Rep: 
|
process is always using not more than 49.1 %MEM
So, if you read the title, you are, probably, guessing, what is my concern about.
How do I make my highest priority process to utilize more memory, than it does.
I am having 16GB of MEM.
This is, what process is showing.
8PR -12NI 9.9gVIRT 7.7gRES S 178%CPU 49.1%MEM java
It is always on 49.1%MEM.
Process is starting with a command:
nice -n -12 java -Xincgc -Xmx9G -jar -server hacktheplanet.jar nogui
|
|
|
|
05-10-2012, 03:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 1,380
|
It's not going to use more memory than it needs. If you see a spike in i/o wait then you know the app is trying to allocate memory that your server doesn't have available.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-10-2012, 04:08 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2012
Posts: 50
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Seriously, it just hangs on 49,1%MEM for a several hours now.
It does not move. I want it to utilize all the potential.
|
|
|
|
05-10-2012, 04:09 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 1,380
|
Seriously, Linux is awesome at memory management and it will give the resources to a process if they are available. Just because it is sitting at 49% does not mean there is a problem. If you look at top do you see any i/o wait or load on the server at all?
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-10-2012, 04:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2012
Posts: 50
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I see this:
load average: 0.46, 0.48, 0.53
Mem: 16463864k total, 16374960k used, 88904k free, 315796k buffers
Cpu(s): 14.9%us, 0.8%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.1%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%
Does it look like a load for you? I just tried to perform a memory intense task in my process and memory usage level didn't even move.
That is very strange. I guess, even very demanding tasks on my server don't need more memory, than allocated, or something like that.
But this 49,1. Why such a random number? How did it calculated it to be on 49,1%MEM?
I want to understand from mathematical perspective, why exactly this amount of mem is used.
|
|
|
|
05-10-2012, 04:36 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 1,380
|
You can start looking deep into the proc files for the process if you really want to. It's very possible that a big part of that 49.1% is cached dirty memory. So your process may only be using 5-10% but the Linux kernel has not cleaned the rest of that memory and released it as no other apps have requested any memory.
Your top output looks well within optimal ranges, almost perfect.
My advice is don't fix whats not broke, but if you really want to figure it out start hacking into the /proc/ directory and looking at the proc files for that process(not fun at all).
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|