LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2007, 08:55 PM   #1
hallows1
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Debian 3.1, Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 15
Internal Mail Server


I am trying to create a mail server for inside an organisation with approximately 150 people, it doesnt have to be a mail server that sends out to the real world, can someone please point me in the right direction, i will be using Ubuntu Server 6.06 or Debian 4
 
Old 05-01-2007, 02:04 AM   #2
fukawi2
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: ArchLinux, ArchServer, Fedora, CentOS
Posts: 448

Rep: Reputation: 34
Try http://www.qmailrocks.org

It's running my company and is lovely

I've got about 100 users distributed over Australia and New Zealand - this server ticks over nicely over a P4 / 1gig RAM / 76gb RAID 5

Code:
[phillips@mail ~]$ uptime
 17:04:12 up 51 days, 19:40,  1 user,  load average: 0.44, 0.38, 0.31
 
Old 05-01-2007, 07:17 AM   #3
archtoad6
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX (usa)
Distribution: MEPIS, Debian, Knoppix,
Posts: 4,727
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 230Reputation: 230Reputation: 230
fukawi2, are you doing IMAP or just POP?
 
Old 05-01-2007, 08:43 AM   #4
JimBass
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian Sid 2.6.32
Posts: 2,100

Rep: Reputation: 48
Default qmailrocks install does both pop3 and imap. I use it everywhere, it is a great mail setup. It handles spam and virus scanning (even better when you add in rbl lists from spamcop), and requires user authentication to send.

This uptime isn't even that good, we moved this server from one colo to another. I could easily see a server uptime reaching into 3-4 year range.

Code:
jim@billing:~$ uptime
 09:39:18 up 225 days,  7:52,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.16, 0.16
Peace,
JimBass
 
Old 05-01-2007, 06:04 PM   #5
fukawi2
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: ArchLinux, ArchServer, Fedora, CentOS
Posts: 448

Rep: Reputation: 34
JimBass - that is more impressive. I had to shut mine down to rebuild our whole server room though

I was really trying to show the load average - your's is even a bit lower than mine
 
Old 05-01-2007, 07:18 PM   #6
JimBass
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian Sid 2.6.32
Posts: 2,100

Rep: Reputation: 48
That server is running on 2 Intel III 1266 Mhz processors with 2 Gb of RAM. It's a Dell rackmount unit, and it behaves very well with hardware raid keeping it happy and healthy. It sees about 10,000 email messages in a typical day. When I posted that it was 9:45 am localtime, so the server had been getting hammered for the past hour by businesses. That server handles mail for all of our clients (we're a small ISP) who don't run their own mail. It probably has about 500 accounts on 20 domains, but only 100 or so of them are heavily active. True dual processors can drastically reduce loads well. Your P4 may have more processing power than both of my processors put together, but just having the ability to distribute the load keeps the averages low.

I would easily lose an uptime competition if one were to get started. My secondary DNS has an uptime of about 600 days, but I have seen BSD boxes (3 or 4 of them) on my coworkers old university with greater than 1000 days of uptime. Much like the duracell battery commercials from the old days, "they keep going, and going, and going." One easily could get the same results (long uptime) from linux, but it does take a bit more work. You do occasionally need to clear out things in /tmp, and keep the auto updater from grabbing a new kernel. Beyond that, any "server" that truly is a server (no gui, CLI only) really shouldn't have any issues staying up, given a battery backup. Most of the time one of our servers goes down it is either due to power loss (battery backup turns on and runs out) or the battery itself dies within a functioning unit, and you need to disconnect to replace the battery. When/if we know something like that will happen will drop a new kernel in before the reboot, but I have many boxes running like champs on old kernels, like the default 2.4.27 from Debian Sarge that have been up more than a year.

Peace,
JimBass

Last edited by JimBass; 05-01-2007 at 07:20 PM.
 
Old 05-01-2007, 10:13 PM   #7
fukawi2
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: ArchLinux, ArchServer, Fedora, CentOS
Posts: 448

Rep: Reputation: 34
Absolutely JimBass - Power is what kills uptime

I've had my qmailrocks install since December, and I haven't had to shutdown / reboot it once apart from when power was going to be shutoff... Beats the heck out of my old 602Pro Lansuite on Win2000 mail server! I had to restart that at least 3 times a week

So in conclusion, we recommend http://www.qmailrocks.org
 
  


Reply

Tags
qmail


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Internal Mail Server Question xanimal Linux - Server 2 09-11-2006 10:59 AM
forward mail to internal mail server suse 9.2 brian1978 Linux - Security 1 02-22-2006 02:25 PM
SUSE as an internal mail server Sarcha Suse/Novell 2 11-29-2005 08:51 AM
Internal Mail Server Question Breezwell Linux - Software 4 01-24-2004 07:25 PM
Postfix relaying mail to internal mail server tradecraft1 Linux - Networking 2 10-28-2003 03:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration