LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2010, 03:29 PM   #1
karateckie
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Effect (slow down?) using LVM on LUN


Good afternoon! I'm looking for pointers to information or opinions on using LVM to manage space presented from a SAN. I'm mainly curious as to the effects using LVM can have on access speeds, if there is any. There are some similar threads on LVM & SAN space, I know LVM will manage the space just fine. However I've not seen anything aiming at answering impact on speed.

In this particular case, we're using RHEL 5.4, HP DM Multipath to handle the fiber connections, and QLogic HBAs (not sure if that makes any difference).

I'd like to use LVM due to the ease of adding space later if needed. Does LVM add enough overhead that I should reconsider?

Thanks!
Kara
 
Old 05-13-2010, 03:47 PM   #2
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 6,028
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791
No.

LVM adds no significant performance impact. It's main overhead is additional disk space used for its structures but even that isn't any worse than say using software RAID or a filesystem (though of course you'll put filesystems on top of the LVs and use a little more space).

The benefits to using it outweigh not using in my mind.

I've used LVM quite extensively on HP-UX for more than 10 years and on Linux both for internal storage, internal RAID storage and external SAN attached storage without any noticeable performance issues for the last 4-5 years.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-13-2010, 03:54 PM   #3
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora, Lubuntu, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,930
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
With the important caveat that I haven't actually measured performance differences, I can also say that LVM on top of DM Multipath on top of SAN LUNs delivers very acceptable performance.

And I'd reiterate the point above: what good, functional alternative do you have? (If you have one, I'd like to know, actually.)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-13-2010, 06:02 PM   #4
karateckie
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thumbs up

Great! That was the answer I was hoping for. Thanks for both of your input. I hadn't noticed any issues using LVM for local storage but wasn't sure of it in other situations.

anomie,
I'm not aware of an alternative to LVM.
 
Old 05-14-2010, 09:02 AM   #5
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 6,028
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791Reputation: 791
Actually Veritas (excuse me - now Symantec) Storage Foundation is an "alternative" but it is FO$$ (Financial Outlay Static Software ) as opposed to FOSS. Its Volume Manager offers quite a bit of flexibility especially in cluster environments but although I've used it on both HP-UX and Solaris I've not used it on Linux. Is has both the volume manager and the Veritas Journaled Filesystem which allows for some fairly impressive scaling and is more mature than ext4 and some of the newer filesystems offered in Linux.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply

Tags
lun, lvm, san


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lvm ontop of raid10 or combine two raid1 via lvm? okar Linux - Server 3 09-11-2009 03:37 PM
EUID,UUID,LVM,LUN,cOW pavan.manipal Linux - Software 3 07-27-2009 01:10 PM
Forcing LVM to see a bigger LUN bboy-mass Red Hat 1 10-20-2007 08:29 PM
LUN Device Mapping: 2 devices map to same lun DantePasquale Linux - Distributions 0 09-24-2007 03:59 PM
LXer: Back Up (And Restore) LVM Partitions With LVM Snapshots LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-17-2007 12:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration