Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Good afternoon! I'm looking for pointers to information or opinions on using LVM to manage space presented from a SAN. I'm mainly curious as to the effects using LVM can have on access speeds, if there is any. There are some similar threads on LVM & SAN space, I know LVM will manage the space just fine. However I've not seen anything aiming at answering impact on speed.
In this particular case, we're using RHEL 5.4, HP DM Multipath to handle the fiber connections, and QLogic HBAs (not sure if that makes any difference).
I'd like to use LVM due to the ease of adding space later if needed. Does LVM add enough overhead that I should reconsider?
LVM adds no significant performance impact. It's main overhead is additional disk space used for its structures but even that isn't any worse than say using software RAID or a filesystem (though of course you'll put filesystems on top of the LVs and use a little more space).
The benefits to using it outweigh not using in my mind.
I've used LVM quite extensively on HP-UX for more than 10 years and on Linux both for internal storage, internal RAID storage and external SAN attached storage without any noticeable performance issues for the last 4-5 years.
Actually Veritas (excuse me - now Symantec) Storage Foundation is an "alternative" but it is FO$$ (Financial Outlay Static Software ) as opposed to FOSS. Its Volume Manager offers quite a bit of flexibility especially in cluster environments but although I've used it on both HP-UX and Solaris I've not used it on Linux. Is has both the volume manager and the Veritas Journaled Filesystem which allows for some fairly impressive scaling and is more mature than ext4 and some of the newer filesystems offered in Linux.