Distro recommendations for a newbie (Please not Ubuntu, I'm a real man!)
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been using Pidgin and Firefox for some time now, they've barely put a dent in my memory usage. Are you using some really old version of them? I'm curious, what are your recommended alternatives? Maybe I should try them out.
Honestly, I'm not sure anymore, it's been a long time since I cared about memory usage. I used to use tik on a solaris box with something like 64 MB of RAM, and if I remember correctly, that supports AIM, ICQ, and MSN. On low-memory Windows systems, I use Opera as a substitute for Firefox; on linux, I suppose your best bet might be to use Firefox 3, which has thus far impressed me with the reduced memory leaks.
Yes! Especially if you look at the system requirements given by various distributors for their current versions, Slackware is the only option you have with only 64MB of RAM. Besides of this, Windows 2000 also needs a minimum of 128MB - and it's a lot faster than any linux distro you could grab (due to the fact that it's as old as your hardware and there is no 8-year old linux distro still supported and still running current days applications).
Slackware would be the best choice for you anyway, I think, because you seem wanting to learn how it is done the linux way.
I've got a Toshiba 4180xcdt running a whopping 400 mhz and with 128mb ram (maxxed) I have Debian Etch (gonna put Lenny on this weekend). It had KDE on it though it is a little sluggish. But I also have IceWm for performance. Not really bad. Only thing is you'll have to do some leg work to get wireless working (from what I've heard. I don't use it myself)
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
Rep:
I understand what you say about Ubuntu. It is not bad, but the idea of hiding everything which may look technical and the weird sudo approach which let you do anything while you are not really the root made me turn away from Ubuntu.
OK, I am a convinced Debian user myself, so I am biased, but I can recommend Debian to anyone else who is willing to spend some time reading thru the Debian installation manual and Debian reference manual. Debian package management is superb, and so are the tools for kernel and module compilation.
I prefer KDE over Gnome, but KDE won't run on 64 MB. Choose a lightweight WM like IceWM or Fluxbox. Salvaging ancient hardware is one of my favorite pastimes as well, but by all means, try to get some classical SDRAM strips and you'll be much happier. Processor speed doesn't matter. It is the [memory] size that matters. (Pun intended given you thread title)
OTOH, if you are building a server, you don't need any GUI at all, and you can happily start with 64 MB. I am running my main server at home on a PII-300 / 192 MB.
Yes! Especially if you look at the system requirements given by various distributors for their current versions, Slackware is the only option you have with only 64MB of RAM. Besides of this, Windows 2000 also needs a minimum of 128MB - and it's a lot faster than any linux distro you could grab (due to the fact that it's as old as your hardware and there is no 8-year old linux distro still supported and still running current days applications).
Ark mentions 64MB as it's minimum requirement, or did you forget to check that?
As for Win2K running faster than any Linux distro, ARE YOU CRAZY? I used Windoze for all my life before Linux (including Win2K), and no Windoze is as fast as Ark and Yoper (though Yoper will probably not run on 64MB because it's optimized for newer CPUs).
I use TinyFlux (PCLOS) on my archaich 330Mhz box. It's GUI is Fluxbox based. The LAMP instal from the Control Panel is there with an easy Firewall with PSAD, and you can add users, and even virtual hosts. Being a Mandriva Linux fork the commands are generic linux when you get the urge to open the terminal! Howtoforge.com has a lot samples to get you going.
Yo, folks! Read it again. He's not planning on doing this on the laptop with 64 meg, he's doing it on the salvaged P-III with 512 meg. Shouldn't be a problem.
SauceForge, consider using a GUI distro and gradually learning the command line stuff as you go. Get your system up and running with the GUI, then start examining the config files and comfortable with editing them in a console. Wean yourself off the GUI. When you are ready, shut down the GUI and enjoy!
Command line! HA! REAL men simply WILL the computer to respond by force of their magnetic personalities! And if the computer doesn't respond, they type all their commands in assembler language!
Arrrhhg, matey!
But for those of us in the real world, starting with baby steps ain't necessarily a bad idea.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.