LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2010, 10:36 AM   #1
petebart
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: Massachusetts USA
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Constraints of Linux support models


Is the conventional Linux support business model of obtaining ongoing support direct from a particular Linux distribution vendor too constraining? Strategic consulting firm Oliver Wyman has an interesting report up on the More Interoperability web site (http://moreinterop.com/Resources.aspx).

The June 2010 report consolidates viewpoints from interviews with enterprise IT execs and concludes many of them feel “they do not have recourse when they do not get the quality of support they require, since the conventional option has been to rely on the distribution vendor for support. IT Executives also expressed concerns in their ability to integrate their Linux environment with other parts of their server architecture, either with their Windows servers or across multiple Linux distributions where there was a mixed Linux environment.”

It looks into the decision-making of those who have opted for Novell ESS to support SUSE and/or Red Hat Enterprise Server and those who have opted not to divorced the support relationship from their original distribution platform vendor.

Anybody here prefer third-party support rather than direct from the Linux vendor you came to the dance with?

Last edited by petebart; 07-02-2010 at 10:37 AM.
 
Old 07-02-2010, 11:19 AM   #2
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 5,973
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777
Anything that touts the Novell/Microsoft hookup is suspect in my view.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-12-2010, 09:29 AM   #3
petebart
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: Massachusetts USA
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by MensaWater View Post
Anything that touts the Novell/Microsoft hookup is suspect in my view.
Thanks for responding. Would you mind expanding on that thought? Is there something in particular that prompted that response, or just a general unease with the Novell/Microsoft relationship?

[About me: tinyurl.com/petebart]
 
Old 07-12-2010, 10:53 AM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429
Firstly, that's very simplistic - most large organisations have their own, internal, *nix support engineers. They would only go to Red Hat for problems that cannot be fixed locally. In much the same way that large companies have a route into Microsoft. So really, all RH is doing is using a similar model that has been seen to work for MS.

That link, by the way, is terrible. Firstly, we have to look through a list of articles to find the one you are discussing. Secondly, who puts articles online as PDFs in 2010? Have moreinterop never heard of people who read articles online? And thirdly, you didn't declare your interest - it seems that (according to your PDF bio) you blog for moreinterop. Not that that final point invalidates your post, but it's good to be upfront on these things.
 
Old 07-13-2010, 01:05 PM   #5
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 5,973
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by petebart View Post
Thanks for responding. Would you mind expanding on that thought? Is there something in particular that prompted that response, or just a general unease with the Novell/Microsoft relationship?

[About me: tinyurl.com/petebart]
Essentially Novell signed an agreement with Microsoft holding each other harmless for possible intellectual property issues relating to Linux. I didn't like it because it presumes that MS would have any basis for saying their intellectual property is violated by Linux. The agreement's existence lends credibility to the idea when IMHO there is none. In fact it is more likely MS has pirated Linux code in my view but of course I have no way to prove that since MS is closed source. I have heard anecdotes suggesting that the early MS TCP/IP stuff was actually outputting messages showing it came from the GNU stuff.

Last edited by MensaWater; 07-13-2010 at 01:06 PM.
 
Old 07-13-2010, 01:31 PM   #6
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by MensaWater View Post
I have heard anecdotes suggesting that the early MS TCP/IP stuff was actually outputting messages showing it came from the GNU stuff.
In the "Help/About" for MS TCP/IP they credit the BSD team.
 
Old 07-13-2010, 03:41 PM   #7
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 5,973
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP View Post
In the "Help/About" for MS TCP/IP they credit the BSD team.
...now.

One wonders if they did that before someone realized from whence it came. As I said what I heard was an anecdote so it could be completely false for all I know.
 
Old 07-13-2010, 05:09 PM   #8
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429
IIRC, I first saw that on Windows for Workgroups 3.11 or Win 95. There has never been an issue with MS using BSD stuff - the BSD licence explicitly allows anyone to take their code and do whatever you want with it without giving back. It is very very liberal.
 
Old 07-14-2010, 09:17 AM   #9
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 5,973
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777
Interesting write-up on use of BSD TCP/IP here:
http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displays.../19/05641/7357
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:06 AM   #10
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429
It is. It doesn't necessarily debunk the "BSD code in Windows" idea, but it does make it clear that (as I said) it was used openly and legally. Microsoft do so many bad things that this is not something to waste any ire over
 
Old 07-14-2010, 12:39 PM   #11
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 5,973
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777
No ire on my part. If I allowed myself to get angry over what I view as M$ bad ethics and outright flouting of laws I'd have died of apoplexy long ago.
 
Old 07-14-2010, 12:43 PM   #12
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429Reputation: 429
Actually, I think that's one of the good things about them - they do provide credit where they should. Mainly, I guess, because it's easier to just put the few extra characters in place than to get the legal team revved up to do some work

And the "ire" bit was a general one - I don't have the impression that you are particularly wound up about this.
 
  


Reply

Tags
support


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What brands/models for best Linux compatibility? Changes Linux - Laptop and Netbook 6 08-04-2009 11:04 AM
how do I meet my locale constraints? jonaskoelker Linux - Software 0 08-23-2005 09:06 PM
File size constraints on ISO jonthelam Linux - General 2 09-29-2004 05:49 PM
SuSe 9.1 Password constraints cl2imson Linux - Newbie 3 05-19-2004 10:24 AM
how can i edit nif 3d models in linux? jzono1 Linux - Software 0 01-13-2004 10:10 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration