Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-01-2004, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Silicon Valley East, Northern Virginia
Distribution: FreeBSD,Debian, RH, ok well most of em...
Posts: 238
Rep:
|
strange question
I have an odd question. I have been looking for a way to make a "poor man's" Interspect. Checkpoint has a "system" that sits on a segment. It watches all traffic (at layer 2 I assume) for packet signatures and matches them to a database of virus or IDS signatures. If it sees a positive match it will block all traffic from the offending machine and disable any routes. Effectively keeping "bad" systems from infecting other non-patched systems on the LAN.
I know that I can put my firewall in bridged mode dropping it to layer 2 as a network hop basically but still filtering per my rules. I can also add Snort to beef up what is seen and alert. My question is, how could I also effectively block an offending machine?
My assumption is an auto-rule to "block any from offending ip".
snort-inline maybe???
|
|
|
|
06-03-2004, 12:34 PM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 24,778
|
Yeah, Snort can send RST's to both parties or use 3rd party apps to help blocking by firewall.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2004, 12:44 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Distribution: Suse 8.0
Posts: 247
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by unSpawn
Yeah, Snort can send RST's to both parties or use 3rd party apps to help blocking by firewall.
|
Can you possible provide a link to docs on implementing snort sending rst's? I found this but was unable to grasp exactly what it is saying
http://www.snort.org/docs/snort_manual/node16.html
One other question; since snort just watches the traffic, not route it, wouldn't it be possible for a host to be infected/compromised before snort could process the rule and send back a rst packet?
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|