Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hello
i recently joined up the sysdept in my workplace. firewall here uses a mix of squid and iptables to block/accept certain kind of traffics and/or give access to some user to access certain sites or use messengers. i have found out an interesting thing going on here but. some users with no priveleges to access hotmail and msn msgr are still using it and i have no clue as to how they are doing this. we have blocked the dport of restricted sites for all the users except some and they shouldn't have access to them. still i can't figure it out. can somebody guide me as to how they are doing it and what can i do to block them permanently? the reason for blocking such sites are unknown to me so only the management knows.
Could they be using their own proxy servers? An anonymizer? You need to look at their traffic logs.
Slightly harsh but you could just boot them from the network for irregular use and make them tell you what they did when they come to complain. If they signed an agreement to not bypass security restrictions and they are doing that, you have every right to boot them.
Does using a tunnel in http violates the policy?
What should a policy mention to forbid this?
I have lots of friends that do this in my company and I'm really wondering..
Talk before booting maybe .. If this reappears, boot
i think this is it. i am checking my access.log files for any occurences of the sites that i have collected through visiting sites provided by gr3p. i will write back if i find something interesting...
i found out an unusual site -unipeak.com which provides webproxy service to anomously surf the web. there are hundreds of similar sites in the web like proxyweb.net,rajorthought.com etc.. that provide this kind of service. anyway i got to the core of it. thanx everybody.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.