LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2009, 06:40 PM   #1
mike2010
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 15
Security Scan help


Could I get some help with my Security Scan. It seems to show quite a few bad things.

every small amount of input is appreciated.

The usr/bin stuff I never messed around with manually. So I dont know why im getting those Warnings. Maybe because I have Plesk on the server ?


Quote:
[19:14:29] /usr/bin/GET [ Warning ]
[19:14:29] Warning: The command '/usr/bin/GET' has been replaced by a script: /usr/bin/GET: perl script text executable

[19:14:29] /usr/bin/groups [ Warning ]
[19:14:29] Warning: The command '/usr/bin/groups' has been replaced by a script: /usr/bin/groups: Bourne shell script text executable

[19:14:30] /usr/bin/ldd [ Warning ]
[19:14:30] Warning: The command '/usr/bin/ldd' has been replaced by a script: /usr/bin/ldd: Bourne shell script text executable

[19:14:30] /usr/bin/passwd [ OK ]
[19:14:30] Info: Found file '/usr/bin/passwd': it is whitelisted for the 'file immutable-bit' check.

[19:14:32] /usr/bin/whatis [ OK ]
[19:14:32] Info: Found file '/usr/bin/whatis': it is whitelisted for the 'script replacement' check.


[19:14:32] /sbin/ifdown [ Warning ]
[19:14:32] Warning: The command '/sbin/ifdown' has been replaced by a script: /sbin/ifdown: Bourne-Again shell script text executable

[19:14:32] /sbin/ifup
[ Warning ]
[19:14:33] Warning: The command '/sbin/ifup' has been replaced by a script: /sbin/ifup: Bourne-Again shell script text executable


[19:15:08] Checking '/etc/xinetd.d/ftp_psa' for enabled services [ Warning ]

[19:15:09] Checking '/etc/xinetd.d/poppassd_psa' for enabled services [ Warning ]

[19:15:09] Checking '/etc/xinetd.d/smtp_psa' for enabled services [ Warning ]
[19:15:09] Checking '/etc/xinetd.d/smtps_psa' for enabled services [ Warning ]
[19:15:09] Checking '/etc/xinetd.d/submission_psa' for enabled services [ Warning ]

[19:15:16] Checking for hidden files and directories [ Warning ]

[19:15:16] Warning: Hidden directory found: /dev/.udev

[19:15:16] Warning: Hidden file found: /usr/share/man/man1/..1.gz: gzip compressed data, from Unix, max compression
 
Old 04-15-2009, 02:59 AM   #2
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Have your distro's package manager or filesystem integrity checker verify the entities are as installed, then check your rkhunter.conf for the script whitelisting options?
 
Old 04-15-2009, 05:27 PM   #3
mike2010
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 132

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by unSpawn View Post
Have your distro's package manager or filesystem integrity checker verify the entities are as installed, then check your rkhunter.conf for the script whitelisting options?
huh?

Does anything stick out as a possible security risk ? I have SSH access allowed only per my IP. And always keep up to date with server / firewall updates.

maybe those warnings are just for the super paranoid to stress about ?
 
Old 04-15-2009, 06:17 PM   #4
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike2010 View Post
Does anything stick out as a possible security risk ? I have SSH access allowed only per my IP. And always keep up to date with server / firewall updates.
Even though it's nice to see you have implemented IP restrictions and have the discipline to keep up to date, I'm not given to guessing about risks and especially not based on only this. Therefore I'd rather present you with a fishing rod rather than fish. That way you can make certain things are as they should be.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mike2010 View Post
maybe those warnings are just for the super paranoid to stress about ?
Even though it may be a known false positive and nothing to "stress" about I don't care for discussing opinions or labels like "super paranoid". I'd rather make certain and get things over with. Way more efficient.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nessus scan and no port scan possible? memo007 Linux - Security 1 09-08-2008 06:21 PM
LXer: Coverity to Regularly Scan Security and Quality of 250 Open Source Projects LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-02-2007 12:46 AM
To SCAN or not to SCAN? HP750xi Suse 9.2 Pro newtwolinux Linux - Hardware 4 06-22-2005 04:02 PM
Solaris 10 x86 CIS security scan ghouliajoolia Solaris / OpenSolaris 5 02-11-2005 10:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration