LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2005, 09:40 PM   #1
twk
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Distribution: Fedora/RHEL
Posts: 152

Rep: Reputation: 31
Package version


I have a VPS currently using fedora core 2. I am finding a lot of packages are old. I want to keep it updated without install everything manually (download source or individual rpms).

My other option is CentOS 3, but their package seems to be even older, eventhough 3.6 was release recently.

eg.

fc2
httpd-2.0.51-2.9.i386.rpm

centos3
httpd-2.0.46-53

which one should I use? (for a personal server that host couple of sites with small traffic)
 
Old 11-10-2005, 09:56 PM   #2
spooon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,755

Rep: Reputation: 48
FC2 has been no longer supported for a while. That means that no package updates are released for it. If you don't want to install stuff manually, your best option is probably to upgrade to FC4, which has pretty much the newest versions of software.
 
Old 11-11-2005, 09:00 AM   #3
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 27,001
Blog Entries: 54

Rep: Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756
FC2 has been no longer supported for a while. That means that no package updates are released for it.
While that is true for the distribution release and upgrades from RH/Fedora, there is still support for FC2: google for "Fedora Legacy". DAG (apt.sw.be) (still) builds FC2 rpms as well for stuff like Snort.

Looking at the problems posted on LQ about FC4 I would never recommend upgrading to a bleeding edge release unless people are definately willing to bleed all over the place for the benefit of having "pretty much the newest versions of software".


My other option is CentOS 3, but their package seems to be even older, eventhough 3.6 was release recently.
CentoS gets its packages from RedHat, RH doesn't increase version numbers like others do. Check the info on the latest package release number, it usually has the fixes and patches.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to know the version of a package installed ? rockwell_001 Linux - Newbie 1 04-12-2005 03:25 PM
is the a package of ndiswrapper-1.1 version in rpm golpemortal Linux - Wireless Networking 2 03-28-2005 09:04 PM
Checking the version of a package _maco_ Linux - Newbie 4 02-04-2004 05:37 PM
kernel package release version xperience Linux - Software 2 12-12-2003 10:13 AM
Package Version erva Linux - Newbie 1 09-28-2003 11:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration