Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I use ClamAV and F-Prot, but only because I like to play with malware. I don't know if they have on-access capability.
However, anti-virus on Linux is a lot less important than on Windows. Not only is the vast majority of malware written for Windows, Linux is designed to make common sense actually count for something (user and application permissions, user account controls, etc).
I use ClamAV and F-Prot, but only because I like to play with malware. I don't know if they have on-access capability.
However, anti-virus on Linux is a lot less important than on Windows. Not only is the vast majority of malware written for Windows, Linux is designed to make common sense actually count for something (user and application permissions, user account controls, etc).
Linux + common sense = no need for anti-virus.
Well I agree. My linux boxes, are connected to 2 windows boxes, so the chance is there. Also I get a few bit and bobs, from what you mught call dodgy sites. Ok I could just scan the download directery, but on access would be nice. Pure lazyness! cheers though.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.