Loop-aes vs DM-crypt
I'd like to know the current consensus on whether loop-aes or dm-crypt is the preferred method of encryption; what their relative advantages and disadvantages are.
I have also read that dm-crypt has more known weaknesses than loop-aes and I was wondering if that is still the case for dm-crypt > 2.6.10.
loop-aes is obsolete. that means it's old and not supported anymore.
dm-crypt (with luks) is the new standard for disk encryption.
Without doubts you should go for dm-crypt (with luks).
Advantage of dm-crypt over loop-aes:
- new standard, supported, future, etc etc
- no need to patch the kernel. The support for dm-crypt is already in the 2.6.x official kernel.
- if you use luks (Linux Unified key setup) there is the possibility to have more passpharase (max 5) for the encryption key. You could add/delete passphrases
- the key (with all the parameters - key length, algorithm etc) resides on you encryption partition at the first bloks of your hdd. This means that you can take you hard-drive and insert into another system(the kernel must be compiled with dm-crypt support) and it should work without any other modification from the user point of view.
- Maybe there are also other
If I am wrong, please correct me.
loop-aes, dm-crypt, etc
I personally use losetup -e AES256 on my Knoppix 4.0 live CD.
How secure is this?
|All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.|