Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm sure they could have one target a particular distro as well, depending on how whoever programmed it as certain distros are built differently.
But I'm sure anyone who creates a virus for Linux is going to try and make it so it attacks any standard distro.
it wont happen as long as people have the sense to use there root accounts carfully and they keep all there daemons patched up to date. executables only have the capabilities of the user that executed them so running a program as a normal user cant damage the system, it can only damage that persons home directory. bsd is pretty much the same as linux for executable permissions so anything that can target linux could target bsd or any of the other unices.
now if you were to ask how long before we have distros that use pam to completely remove authentication, and the root user gets logged in automatically i would unfortunately have to say very soon, this is where i see distros like mandrake going. its the age old battle of user friendliness vs security and unfortunately i think the former will win. when that happens we'll have more viruses than words in the dictionary.
Originally posted by kev82 it wont happen as long as people have the sense to use there root accounts carfully and they keep all there daemons patched up to date. executables only have the capabilities of the user that executed them so running a program as a normal user cant damage the system, it can only damage that persons home directory. bsd is pretty much the same as linux for executable permissions so anything that can target linux could target bsd or any of the other unices.
now if you were to ask how long before we have distros that use pam to completely remove authentication, and the root user gets logged in automatically i would unfortunately have to say very soon, this is where i see distros like mandrake going. its the age old battle of user friendliness vs security and unfortunately i think the former will win. when that happens we'll have more viruses than words in the dictionary.
This is very good to know. In that case, perhaps those who wish to stay safe can continue to use the older versions of Linux. I am sure that they would all be available somewhere on the net for download evven then.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.