Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
[bong@localhost ~]$ netstat -anp --tcp
(Not all processes could be identified, non-owned process info
will not be shown, you would have to be root to see it all.)
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 1 0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:32791 yyy.yyy.yy.yyy:8080 CLOSE_WAIT 4451/konquerorz9GTL
i issued the command when connected to internet...
i omitted local address and foreign address with a seried pf x and y for privacy reason.....
it appears local tcp port 32791 is connected to remote 8080
please if i'm worng ..explain me..
the state column report Close_wait
what does this means.......?
that the connection is established but the port is closed ?
to be more clear......this morning i buy a linuxmagazine where a tip informed me that the concept of a firewall MUST ported from winxp may be not the same in linux if there are not open ports.......infact the tip continue to inform me that ubuntu has not a preconfigured firewall...
my env: is mandriva 10.1 running with shorewall
so i opened this thread to help me verifying this...
please help me clarifying my doubts...
if i am in a such situation does still i need a firewall ?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.