Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
//This topic belongs in networking, not security.
What it basically does is respond to the remote MTA with a 4xx, meaning "error, try again", forcing the remote server to set aside resources to try again. If that's creative use of error codes or abuse depends on your point of view. Since there isn't any real error, in my book that amounts to abuse. Anyone using this, and those freaks using that thingie where you have to register with them proving yourself a "legitimate sender" (I know there's a term for that can't remember it tho), will never make it out of my blacklists.
and those freaks using that thingie where you have to register with them proving yourself a "legitimate sender" (I know there's a term for that can't remember it tho)
I think the term you're looking for is "whitelist". I agree it's a complete pain in the butt.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.