Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
From the available ciphers (3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH)
I would prefer the Advanced Encryption Standard with 256 bits if I would need a high-level cryptography. Although I would use asymmetric encryption where possible.
Well, the choice comes down to personal preference, but if you read (for example) the Wikipedia page for AES you can get a good idea of why it's such a well-regarded block cipher.
Quote:
what benefits are there for asymmetric encryption versus symmetric?
Which attacks make symmetric encryption more vulnerable?
Once again, Wikipedia has a very informative page about this. There's also tons more info to be found via Google.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.