Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
note that if you did this to me i'd quit !
how do you think you'd feel if you started having all your freedom ripped away. it's not cool
please understand the impact your going to make
note that if you did this to me i'd quit !
how do you think you'd feel if you started having all your freedom ripped away. it's not cool
please understand the impact your going to make
Well, you have the right to quit I'd say ;-p From a business perspective it really is not a bad choice to regulate network access provided the company plays by the rules. If they don't then it's like carrying water to the sea anyways. Maybe check a related note on network acceptable user policy.
Well, you have the right to quit I'd say ;-p From a business perspective it really is not a bad choice to regulate network access provided the company plays by the rules. If they don't then it's like carrying water to the sea anyways. Maybe check a related note on network acceptable user policy.
Im a sys admin for a company who allows some usage of internet for personal usage while not exceeding a limit each day
honestly this is a much better policy and personally how would you feel if the company had such b.s
sorry but i get upset its like me telling you ohh you can drive your car but you cant listen to the radio while you deliver items to customers.
Im a sys admin for a company who allows some usage of internet for personal usage while not exceeding a limit each day
honestly this is a much better policy and personally how would you feel if the company had such b.s
sorry but i get upset its like me telling you ohh you can drive your car but you cant listen to the radio while you deliver items to customers.
Right, but listening to the radio doesn't have any security implications.
What conversation is going on here...i dont want this..i posted the thread saying that i need to block all chat in my company incuding webchat....especially googletalk i need to block..here iam not getting the exact answer..some conversation you are doing..please try to understand the situtaion..and help me out block the all chats and googletalk ..
Having a discussion is perfectly fine as long as it is not off-topic. The discussion here doesn't seem to be off-topic to me. Have you tried denying all connections to talk.google.com with Squid?
Well its kinda hard to block google talk considering the chat client is embedded into the web email
Well, if Google Talk requires clients to connect to talk.google.com in order to work, then blocking connections to that address should prevent it from working - regardless of which client they use. That said, if I was the OP I'd be looking at Squid logs during a Google Talk session to see what exactly is going on and stuff.
The general process I use to check is to set up a connection myself, monitor the traffic with wireshark and start blocking ports based on that.
Sometimes you'll get the ports blocked and the application switches to plain old port 80 (or port 443). That's when our desktop guys start deploying modified policies (mostly win xp here) that prevent the application from being available.
Already blockede talk.google.com..but still the people can access the chat..Any one please help me out blocking google talk and all the chats.....give me the steps..and iam using dansguardian squid proxy server ...
Already blockede talk.google.com..but still the people can access the chat..Any one please help me out blocking google talk and all the chats.....give me the steps..and iam using dansguardian squid proxy server ...
What does the Squid log show while Google Talk is being used?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.