Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've noticed the following hits on my firewall, is there a perfectly good explanation for why these packets are finding their way to my PC, or are there exploits/hacks associated with them? I've omitted the countless hits on ports 135, 137, and 445 (MS.Blaster - shouldn't my ISP be blocking these?)
And also, wtf is SOCKS and AFT? Sounds a bit dodgy to me...
about the broadcasts on port 137, this is in the range for microsoft networks (135:139) and this usually sends UDP packets. that port is "defaulted" to the netbios name service, which might have to do w/ the microsoft network stuff. that's all i've got.
I've noticed the following hits on my firewall, is there a perfectly good explanation for why these packets are finding their way to my PC, or are there exploits/hacks associated with them? I've omitted the countless hits on ports 135, 137, and 445 (MS.Blaster - shouldn't my ISP be blocking these?)
And also, wtf is SOCKS and AFT? Sounds a bit dodgy to me...
If you are on a dynamic IP it is possible that some of the hits could be an error in attempting to reach the PC that previously had that IP.
That said, someone attempted to connect to the mail server on your computer, and most the others are M$ vulnerabilities. I am not sure what the SOCKS thing is but I see it often also.
445 (MS.Blaster - shouldn't my ISP be blocking these?)
No, because windows 2000/2003/XP use port 445 for SMB.
Your ISP will never block any ports.
Ports 135, 137 and 139, these are NETBIOS ports.
Again, windows ports.
As for the other ports, if you get many hits, it is possible someone (or some worm) is trying to connect.
There are a few worms that attack Microsoft's SQL server.
Again windows.
Setup your firewall to block external connections to these ports,
and have faith in Linux.
//moderator.note: merged threads w/o mercy. Don't double-post. Watch your triggerfinger.
Btw, since it's clear by now "the rest" is targetted at MICROS~1 boxen, the only thing you need to worry about is your MTA. If you don't do POP3/IMAP elsewhere and you need to *receive* mail directly, make sure you've taken the right precautions to harden the MTA. If OTOH you need to only *send* email, then disable your MTA, cuz running the daemon then aint necessary.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.