LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2016, 06:24 AM   #1
beachboy2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Wild West Wales, UK
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE, EndeavourOS, antiX, MX Linux
Posts: 3,966
Blog Entries: 32

Rep: Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464Reputation: 1464
Adobe Flash zero-day exploit-April 2016


Yet another Adobe Flash exploit:

http://www.computerworld.com/article...ansomware.html


The vulnerability affects all versions of Flash Player on Windows, Mac, Linux and Chrome OS.
 
Old 04-09-2016, 07:00 AM   #2
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
All the more reason you should have all plugins set to ask-to-run rather than always-run as a security precaution.
 
Old 04-11-2016, 08:46 AM   #3
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,633
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931Reputation: 3931
It is very strange to me, also, that Adobe Flash keeps getting hammered, when HTML5 plus JavaScript, often touted as the inevitable (and "secure") successor, is IMHO far more vulnerable and un-patchable.

With JavaScript (and, with or without HTML5), you can fundamentally modify the behavior of almost every aspect of the system, dynamically. Without changing one scrap of the "secure" source-code that you are executing, you can transform its behavior for good or for ill. When "2+2" can be made to no longer equal "4," you have a problem.

Also, the purported exploit merely led you to an exploit-URL. It did not, and it could not have, "quietly installed" anything at all without being permitted to do so. You can lead a horse to a pool, but you can't make him drink piss.
 
  


Reply

Tags
adobe, exploit, flash, player, vulnerability


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Another day, another flash exploit LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-08-2016 02:42 PM
LXer: Adobe releases emergency patch for Flash zero-day flaw LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-20-2015 01:32 PM
LXer: Happy April Foolsâ?? Day a collection of April fool involving Linux !! LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 04-02-2012 04:57 AM
LXer: The Day After April Fools' Day LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-03-2009 02:00 AM
LXer: Tip of the Day: Install Adobe Flash Player 10 in Debian LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-19-2008 07:00 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration