They're Here! Dell's Ubuntu Linux Systems Now Available
Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i was amused that such a news would be posted by so many sites ,
as a verdor which os pre-installed depends on its commercial profile but when it comes to the user it's up to what they like.i mean that what os the vendor installed is not import ,everthing relay on the user.they can instll whatever they like linux /mc/others.Dell just take the passion of the open source and putting an add.
And the laptop systems are even worse. The price difference is a result of the native intel graphics chipset vs. a dedicated 256MB ATI card. For that difference you could not even buy 1/2 of that card.
Sham from the start.
You can always customize the notebook and choose the "256MB NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 TurboCache" option for an extra $79.
Not bad, think they should have done a custom desktop instead of the .....brown. lol. but its a start
At least you know now that the E1505N is hardware compatible with a major Linux distro, so just about any other major distro should have no problem installing and working properly if you choose to do so.
I was just wondering if one were to acquire a complete computing solution from Dell with Ubuntu... and by this I mean:
-Desktop machine with accelerated 3D graphics card,
-monitor, mouse, keyboard,
-WiFi capabilities,
-dialup hardware,
-printer,
-scanner,
-firewire peripherals,
-bluetooth peripherals,
-a funky 7.1 surround sound card,
-a digital still/video camera,
-gaming peripherals (gamepad, wheel, joystick, etc)
-a wacom pad thingy,
-PDA (Palm, etc)
-<insert any hardware or peripheral you wish to use>...
would they (Dell) be able to provide the customer with the appropriate hardware that would 'just work' when i plugged it in? without coming over here and asking you guys what command i should type in...
If this is the case... Linux should be in for a big boost... and if not, it should be. especially for people who will have a choice between Windows and Ubuntu with a small price difference. Isn't that the reason people go to big companies for? to get that complete solution... more savvy folk go out and buy components after some research.
I hope so, but seems like DELL is at begining stage of deploy Linux solutions, it can't satisfy alot of linux users (Of course windows users). I hope they can continuously improve their product and services. Since dell is a big player. The success of their product will force many IT accessory manufacturer to support linux as well.
Let's see how dell play the game
However, personally I think HP can do better because they have longer experience in Linux. Unfortunately they refuse to provide Desktop/Laptop with pre-installed Linux.
the only way that banner will stay that way is if the Linux community, and new users of course, keep it that way with their wallets... and that is the hard part. Then there is the skeptical camp who say that Dell has only just jumped onto the bandwagon to grab market from smaller players who have been providing solid hardware solutions for Linux for a long time.
Personally, in the country i live in and my home country, there are no official Dell retail outlets. but when I purchased my laptop I specifically bought from the vendor that sold it with Linux preinstalled. Only problem was that the only ones I could find had an unusable distro from a newbie's point of view... it was Linpus with CLI only. Of course the sales person had to throw in the line that any Windows XP will install on it... and he was quite taken aback when I told him that I was looking for a machine to run Linux and I required all the hardware to be supported. I ended up getting an Acer Aspire 3003NLMi.
So hopefully, with Dell pushing Ubuntu into the mainstream, such scenarios will become a rarity... still, we hold the power in our wallets.
the only way that banner will stay that way is if the Linux community, and new users of course, keep it that way with their wallets...
I honestly don't care whether its succesful or not. Linux adoption is far from dependanding on Dell sales. Why I do think it is so exciting is because it shows that linux is getting so popular. _So_ popular that a large company like Dell is willing to infest in it. Note that I marked by popular demand. Why are we not so excited by this milestone? This is a huge leap forward for Linux recognition.
I do not want to sound counter-productive... but the Linux community has always been very vocal when it comes to want we want and promoting it. That is why we made a big noise on Dell's BrainStorm site. Now I am not 100% sure but I think Dell is not the first major company to provide Linux on the Desktop. Only thing is that the others (probably Dell is included here) pulled the plug on those services. I don't see why Dell wouldn't pull the plug if offering Ubuntu preinstalled didn't make financial sense.
On the other hand, down-playing this whole thing is not right because Linux on the Desktop has certainly come a very long way. It is not perfect and is behind the competition in some areas but the opportunity that we have been provided should definitely not be missed.
We, the community, should push for widespread desktop adoption of Linux. So, if Dell's venture is a success, other big players would want a piece of the pie... and they would jump on the bandwagon. This would result in hardware manufacturers wanting Linux users buying their products... and why would we buy their products if they didn't provide support and drivers for them? Also, more coders will start developing for Linux (open and closed source) as there will simply be a market for it. You see, this would give us an even stronger voice in the market, and we stand to benefit from this.
Do you see where I'm getting? ok Linux adoption doesn't depend on Dell's success, but this sure is a great launch pad for that adoption. I still say we should put our money where our mouths are. And since, generally speaking, we are more computer savvy, the onus is on us inform others about Linux and Dell's offers, help people we convince to use Linux, participate and help out in forums, etc...
What it boils down to is the only real driving force behind GNU/Linux is us the community!
I read an article which stated that desktop Linux adoption has got a hard deadline to make an impact on the market... and that deadline? 2008! why? because the desktop environment is making a transition from 32bit to 64bit systems and which ever OS takes the lead as the low end market switches to 64bit is going to determine the dominant OS. The article is quite long but makes for good reading.
In my earlier post I mentioned Dell's hardware support and options on Ubuntu. I found this site which answers some questions...
[...] I read an article which stated that desktop Linux adoption has got a hard deadline to make an impact on the market... and that deadline? 2008! why? because the desktop environment is making a transition from 32bit to 64bit systems and which ever OS takes the lead as the low end market switches to 64bit is going to determine the dominant OS. The article is quite long but makes for good reading.[...]
64-bit has already arrived... I think we don't have any longer because I think the pc in it's current form will dissapear. By current form I mean the combination of a (often huge) case (if any), keyboard, mice and (waybe even, but that might take longer,) computerscreen. Some will say that "Linux is just a kernel so what are you talking about?", well... marketshare when we still have the time to make it visible to the avarage Joe. My theory: Who owns the desktop in the end of it's lifetime, will own the future of computing. We have to learn from histhory and make sure microsoft doesn't grab that market like they did with the pc. It will be exciting. We now know what Microsoft is up to, now we have to find out what apple's been doing (leopard last Mac OS X)
Then again, I might be completely wrong Who knows?
The most significant thing is that this comes with "In-the-home" support for the hardware. Since they ship with the install complete and working, then this is the way to start for someone with no experience at all. Most users are going to be people who unpack the computer plug it in, and expect it to work straight away. In the main we aren't those people.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.