LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > Linux - News
User Name
Password
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2014, 01:52 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,421

Rep: Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628
Red Hat Assistant General Counsel Analyses Supreme Court's Patent Ruling


Quote:
This morning the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision concerning software patents and took a small-but-meaningful step in the right direction.

In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the Court reaffirmed that abstract ideas are not by themselves patentable and unanimously held that the software at issue was no more than an abstract idea. It also held that "merely requiring generic computer implementation fails to transform that abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention."

As I reported last March, the Alice Corp. case involved a patent for using a computerized trading platform for addressing settlement risk in financial transactions—that is, basically an automated escrow system. The Supreme Court framed the question presented in broad terms, indicating that it could make a far-reaching decision on software patents. Not surprisingly, in view of the high stakes, there were dozens of friend-of-the-court briefs, one of which was from Red Hat.

The opinion by Justice Thomas uses the traditional common law methodology of comparing one case to previous similar cases and harmonizing with those most similar. The opinion discusses Bilski and prior cases and states, "[W]e need not labor to delimit the precise contours of the ‘abstract ideas’ category in this case. It is enough to recognize that there is no meaningful distinction between the concept of risk hedging in Bilski and the concept of intermediated settlement at issue here." It would have been helpful to get a fuller explanation of how to determine when a patent is too abstract, but the Court has declined, in this case and prior ones, to attempt a comprehensive theory.
More at OpenSource.com...

--jeremy
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Supreme Court shoots down two more rules put in place by top patent court LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-03-2014 08:41 AM
LXer: Supreme Court looks to rein in top patent court with two new cases LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-14-2014 10:12 AM
LXer: Supreme Court will take up messy software ruling from top patent court LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-07-2013 05:42 PM
Red Hat Takes Software Patents To Supreme Court DragonSlayer48DX Linux - News 0 10-02-2009 07:11 PM
Supreme Court Ruling Ridiculous kencaz General 8 06-30-2005 10:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration