LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > Linux - News
User Name
Password
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2008, 10:18 PM   #1
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 74
Linux: World's Fastest Computers


There are fast computers, and then there are Linux fast computers. Every six months, the Top 500 organization announces "its ranked list of general purpose systems that are in common use for high end applications." In other words, supercomputers. And, as has been the case for years now, the fastest of the fast are Linux computers.

Microsoft is proud that a system running Windows HPC Server 2008 took 10th place... behind nine supercomputers running Linux. Even then, this was really more of a stunt than a demonstration that the HPC Server system is ready to compete with the big boys.

In the meantime, the real work is being done on the Linux computers. The number one supercomputer? Once more it's IBM's Linux-powered Roadrunner That's the same supercomputer, which this summer broke supercomputing's sound barrier: a sustained run of more than one petaflop per second or 1.026 quadrillion calculations per second. Beat that Microsoft!

Needless to say, all the Linux systems do have working parallel-processing languages, like GCC, PGI and PathScale. For now, and the foreseeable future, Linux will not only stay the fastest computers, they'll also be the most useful fast computers.

Read full story.
 
Old 11-28-2008, 03:12 AM   #2
pinniped
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: planet earth
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,732

Rep: Reputation: 50
Not counting the "mixed" systems (I can't easily find information on what the operating systems are), there are about 88 Linux systems per Winduhs system. Linux is running about 2,099,535 CPUs vs 54,144 on WinDuhs. Average CPUs per Linux install: 4782; for WinDuhs: 10,828.

Comparing the top winduhs machine (#10) with #9 (mix of CrayXT3 and XT4), the results in GFLOPs/CPU are comparable (compute power never quite scales linearly with #CPUs). Looking at #8 though (CrayXT4), the winduhs cluster is left for dead even as GFLOPs/CPU. That could be largely the class or generation of CPU though (AMD2.1GHz vs AMD1.9GHz)

So with Top500's LINPACK test it looks like a WinDuhs cluster is comparable to a Linux cluster. I've never administered a supercomputer; any super-admins out there have some idea why MS is just dwarfed in the big boys' club? Is it just the sheer cost of software per CPU or is it the annoying roar of 30k 'cores' rebooting?
 
Old 11-28-2008, 04:00 AM   #3
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinniped View Post
any super-admins out there have some idea why MS is just dwarfed in the big boys' club? Is it just the sheer cost of software per CPU or is it the annoying roar of 30k 'cores' rebooting?
Probably both.

In my own personal experience, Windows has always been a miserable pos. CIP: My "Win98" machine was much faster with Ubuntu 6.06. I am truly impressed that it is faster yet with 8.04. And stability? My system hasn't crashed since Sep 06 when I dumped Windows. Before, it was at least once per day.

Cheers
 
Old 11-28-2008, 07:52 AM   #4
Tons of Fun
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / BackTrack 5/ Linux Mint 11
Posts: 359

Rep: Reputation: 32
I am far from a super-computer admin, but I do have one experience that supports your statements at a desktop level. I was running a tweaked XP Pro desktop running SETI. By tweaked I mean I had removed any unnecessary processes and services, had my page file on another drive, and had done everything at the OS level to make it run faster. It was taking around 20 hours to process 1 unit for SETI. I then installed Debian Sarge on that exact machine with no other changes, and it took around 3 - 5 hours to process SETI data units. I was floored at the difference.

 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: World's fastest supercomputer runs Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-11-2008 10:40 AM
World's fastest internet connection 'used to dry laundry' andrew375 General 4 04-04-2008 04:20 AM
LXer: Spot-Swap Among The World's Fastest Supercomputers LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-15-2006 10:21 AM
LXer: World's Smallest Linux System on View LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 04-24-2006 05:23 AM
Every wonder what the World's Fastest Supercomputer was? jeremy General 2 11-06-2000 10:07 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration