Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News
User Name
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.


  Search this Thread
Old 06-09-2014, 10:08 AM   #1
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 11,250

Rep: Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783Reputation: 2783
Linus Announces Linux 3.15

So I ended up doing an rc8 because I was a bit worried about some last-minute dcache fixes, but it turns out that nobody seemed to even notice those. We did have other issues during the week, though, so it was just as well. The futex fixes and cleanups may stand out, but as usual there's various other random fixes since rc8 in there too: mainly drivers (drm, networking, sound, usb etc), networking, scheduling and perf tooling.

But it's all been fairly small and quiet, which *may* of course be due to the fact that last week was also the first week of the merge window for 3.16. That might have distracted some developers. I'm not entirely convinced I liked the overlap, but it seemed to work ok, and unless people scream really loudly ("Please don't _ever_ do that again") and give good reasons for doing so, I might end up doing that overlapping merge window in the future too if it ends up helping out with some
particular timing issue.

That said, I also don't think it was such a wonderful experience that I'd want to necessarily do the overlap every time, without a good specific reason for doing so. It was kind of nice being productive during the last week or rc (which is usually quite boring and dead), but I think it might be a distraction when people should be worrying about the stability of the rc.

Of course, maybe the overlap ends up meaning that we get less noise during the last week of stabilization, and it actually helps. It could go either way. I'd be interested to hear what people thought, although I _suspect_ most people don't feel strongly either way.

Anyway, with 3.15 released, my "master" branch has already merged the work in my "next" branch on my local machine, and I'll be decommissioning the "next" branch once I push that all out. After that, any future merge window work will happen on "master", and we'll be back to the normal single-branch model for my tree.

Visit LKML for a list of CHANGES...



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linus Torvalds announces Linux 3.12-rc5 after a relatively calm week LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-15-2013 05:10 AM
LXer: Linus on Linux: The Linus Torvalds Interview Part 2 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-27-2009 01:00 PM
LXer: Linus on Linux: The Linus Torvalds Interview Part 1 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-23-2009 03:10 PM
Linux 2.6.6 Linus T Releases BenneJezzerette Slackware 12 03-29-2005 02:32 PM
Save LINUX and Linus - need your help here shazam75 Linux - News 6 01-29-2005 09:02 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration