View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News
User Name
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.


  Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2013, 11:35 AM   #1
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 11,261

Rep: Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787Reputation: 2787
Is the Stable Linux Kernel Moving Too Fast?

From a Linux Kernel mailing List debate sparked by the stable Linux 3.10 kernel being updated twice in a day:

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Stephen Warren <> wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 04:40 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> Presumably the idea is that much useful testing only happens on -rc
> kernels rather than linux-next or arbitrary points in Linus' tree.

Linux-next gets little to no testing outside of compiles.

And I don't think the -rc releases are all that important either. The important part is to _wait_. Not "wait for an -rc". There are reasonable number of developers and users who actually run git kernels, just because they want to help. At rc points, you tend to get a few more of those.

In contrast, when patches get moved from the development tree to stable within a day or two, that patch has gotten basically _no_ testing in some cases (or rather, it's been tested to fix the thing it was supposed to fix, but then there are surprising new problems that it introduces that nobody even though about, and wasn't tested for).

So I don't think "is in an rc release" is the important thing. I think "has been in the standard git tree for at least a week" is what we should aim for.

Will it catch all cases? Hell no. We don't have *that* many people who run git kernels, and even people who do don't tend to update daily anyway. But at least this kind of embarrassing "We found a bug within almost minutes of it hitting mainline" should not make it into stable.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iceweasel 5 - fast and stable (post your feedback). alan_ri Debian 32 07-28-2011 04:51 PM
Best distro? (fast, stable, and a variety of precompiled packages) Mr. Asdf Linux - Distributions 4 06-22-2006 09:27 AM
Time Moving Too Fast revof11 Linux - Hardware 7 12-03-2005 07:43 PM
How stable and fast are wine Windows apps? Jay Smith Linux - Software 3 08-28-2004 07:41 PM
Secure, Stable and Fast Distro? garyura Linux - General 20 09-01-2002 12:51 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration