LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > Linux - News
User Name
Password
Linux - News This forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2013, 10:23 AM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,627

Rep: Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658Reputation: 2658
Change.org petition, ARM SoC changes for Linux 3.12 invite Torvalds’ fury


Quote:
Linus Torvalds, in response to a petition on Change.org to remove RdRand from /dev/random, has lambasted the petitioner by called him ignorant for not understanding the code in Linux Kernel.

Kyle Condon from UK raised a petition on Change.org to get Linus to remove RdRand from /dev/random in a bid “to improve the overall security of the linux kernel.” This petition seems to be a direct result of the recent NSA surveillance revelations where it was also believed that UK’s GCHQ was aiding the US spy agency in its activities.

In his response, Torvalds asked Condon and the supporters of the petition to gain an understanding of Linux drivers, cryptography and then “come back here and admit to the world that you were wrong.” Torvalds stressed that kernel maintainers knew what they were doing and the petitioner didn’t.

Elaborating the use of rdrand, Torvalds stated that the function was being used as just “_one_ of many inputs” to the random pool and that it was used to improve the overall randomness. Torvalds iterated that rdrand did in fact improve the overall quality of random numbers generated through /dev/random. Ending his reply with the statement “you’re ignorant.” The petition is now closed.

Torvalds, in a similar outburst just yesterday, hoped that “ARM SoC hardware designers all die in some incredibly painful accident.” This came in response to a message from Kevin Hilman when he noted that there were quite a few conflicts in the ARM SoC pull request for Linux 3.12, which were a result of the platform changes conflicting with driver changes going in to the V4L tree.
More at Parity News...

Also see:
Change.org petition: http://www.change.org/en-GB/petition...m-dev-random-4
"Intel In Bed with NSA" mailing list thread: http://cryptome.org/2013/07/intel-bed-nsa.htm

--jeremy
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Tiny SBC runs Linux on Xilinx ARM+FPGA SoC LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-07-2013 05:11 AM
LXer: $55 board runs ARM Linux on Freescale Vybrid SoC LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-30-2013 05:51 AM
LXer: Tiny module runs Linux on Altera ARM+FPGA SoC LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-01-2013 09:24 AM
LXer: $99 SBC runs Linux on 1GHz dual-core ARM SOC LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-04-2013 09:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration