LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2004, 10:28 PM   #1
lrt2003
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Fedora 10
Posts: 182

Rep: Reputation: 30
Your installation method? (from source)


What do you keep in /usr/local/src?

I keep the tarballs so they can't be damaged... then if I want to install something I tar -zxvf /usr/local/src into a temporary folder...

Do you create a seperate build folder? What do you do with the remains? How do you preserve the Makefile (and its dependencies?)

I am looking at keeping all the Makefiles in /usr/local/uninstall/[programfolder]

Is it better to just keep the folders how you built them in /usr/local/src? You must build somewhere else first then (because you don't want to do ./configure; make as root(?).. then move it to /usr/local/src?

How do you install things from source, and where do you keep stuff?

This is assuming you don't use any manager such as CheckInstall...
 
Old 06-25-2004, 10:53 PM   #2
mikshaw
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Distribution: Slackware/SuSE/DSL
Posts: 1,320

Rep: Reputation: 45
I just have a download directory in my $HOME where all the archives go, somewhat organized according to what sort of program it is. I don't care about saving makefiles...if anything needs special attention beyond configure/make/make install then I'll either make a text file to remind me or if the README and INSTALL files are good enough I leave it at that.

As far as dependencies, I usually keep those with the main application's tarball when it's something i wouldn't think to install otherwise.

Last edited by mikshaw; 06-25-2004 at 10:57 PM.
 
Old 06-25-2004, 11:48 PM   #3
lrt2003
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Fedora 10
Posts: 182

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I was leaning towards a "more than just yourself" using the computer... so nothing really goes in the ~/ dir
 
Old 06-26-2004, 09:53 AM   #4
Dark_Helmet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,786

Rep: Reputation: 369Reputation: 369Reputation: 369Reputation: 369
I create a /usr/local/src/.tarballs directory. It keeps the tarballs there, and removes the directory from sight when doing listings. Similarly, patches either go in the .tarball directory or a .patches directory; whichever suits your method of organization.

I "cd" to /usr local/src and issue command like: tar xvjf .tarballs/tarball_name.tar.bz2

I build within the directory itself unless specified to do otherwise in the docs.

I store a file with the commands used to compile and install the source. This is usually just a list of the patch commands used and the options to configure; make and make install rarely change.

I run two installs. The first is a compile and install with a non-privileged user. and to a non-standard location. For instance, installing to this user's home directory (something like /home/testinst/local_install). Then I run a find command on the directory to get a list of all the files created/copied, and then make uninstall or just simply delete the whole local_install subtree. The second install is the "real" install, with the location being set to /usr/local or wherever.

After installing, I remove the source tree and save the two files I created: the one with commands to patch/configure the source and the one listing the files installed in some other location (again, wherever your organizational preferences tell you). This way, I can always re-extract the source and get the source tree back to exactly the state it was when I compiled and installed without the need for keeping the source tree around forever. It also allows for manual uninstall if the developers left out that target in the makefile.

Pitfalls of this method: If the install script is hard-wired to copy something to a system location (such as /usr/lib), then its possible the file listing isn't complete. That is, if the make install on the /home/testint/local_install fails because it doesn't have root privileges to make the copy, then commands following that copy may not get executed. Similarly, if make install modified any configuration files, this method will not show it. There might be more, but I haven't noticed them yet.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Method Not Allowed: The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL /writedhcp.p WiWa Linux - Networking 15 01-06-2011 01:20 PM
my installation source directories Sharaz Linux - General 0 09-27-2005 10:48 AM
installation method majeztik *BSD 1 11-04-2004 11:49 PM
Is the method of installation of Unix and Linux the same??? kallan Linux - Newbie 6 09-01-2004 12:14 PM
source installation cd's Vindane Slackware 2 05-29-2004 04:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration