Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Ok basically im stuck between a decision of distro's
First phew notes:
I have installed and tried each. but im still stuck choosing
I realise the disadvantages and advantages of most
Im not after starting a which is "better" argument. i am simply asking people's opinion after long time use. thats were my curiousity is
on youtube reviewer once said "you cant really review a linux distro until you've used for a phew month's" and thats true. no distro is judge-able until a phew months of use, updates, changes, etc
Anyway onto the topic
Im stuck between slackware, gentoo, and archlinux
I like all 3. Archlinux is nice. Pacman is great, i even did a youtube video on arch. ive had little issues but after the installation. i feel im not learning as much as i want to
I realise that i would learn alot more with gentoo, but compiling times are a dreaded future in which i dont have the life for. and Stability does concern me. i dont mind fixing a phew configs, but i hate fixing an entire system
Slackware. well chuck on swaret or simply install Salix Basic. and your all set, and hey, aint it fun installing from source? dear cookie monster heaven. help me
Anyway. Whats the community's opinion on these 3 distro's, and im mostly after long time users, on updating, stability, usefuleness in gaming area's. performance and long time updates/support
Or is there another distro out there that i somehow havn't heard of that could do a similiar job to what im after
Basically what im after is this - Twinkering, a funny terminal to watch 100 lines of code appear when you do Yaourt -S package. stability, Gaming performance - Kernel tweaks possably to improve gaming
though ive never seen a distro that focuses on gaming/performance kernel tweaks. i have heard of teh Liquirox ( however u spell it, reminds me of a food ) kernel which appearently is great for linux gamers with many tweaks, but yet to use it
And most of all. stable updating, with the ability to fix problems, rollback possably. and perferably binary package management for dependency checking and installation
My opinion, go for Slackware, very stable, fast, very long support times, kernel tweaking is no problem, you will probably get more than 100 lines in your terminal when installing software, if needed Wine packages are provided by AlienBob.
By the way, the Liquorix kernels are for Debian and derivatives and is optimized for desktop systems, that may help with gaming, but i don't know that.