[SOLVED] Would this computer be good for dual booting?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am pretty sure I could do dual booting, but would this computer be a good candidate for it capacity-wise etc? I'd be dual booting with Xubuntu 15.10. Thanks.
P.S. I know there would be a zillion better computers but this one would fit my budget and since it's refurbished if it's DOA I won't be crushed.
Probably an E5400 (one of the only dual core non-hyperthreaded processors Intel ever made that fast, and by far the most numerous). Not a horrible processor for it's day, and will be just fine for basic tasks, but you're not going to do any 3d gaming on it, or graphics design and such.
However, for basic usage, yeah, that will be just fine. I'd second frank in that 4 GB would be better, although 2 GB it's tolerable (using a 2 GB laptop right now with full KDE4 on it and it runs quite nicely).
Last edited by Timothy Miller; 10-21-2015 at 06:44 PM.
My desktop system is a Dell Inspiron 531S, which I don't think is too far off of the one you mentioned, "spec" wise. I have an AMD Athlon X2 dual core processor and 2 GB's of memory. While I couldn't tell you about Xubuntu, my system runs Lubuntu just fine. I doubt the system you linked to would run anything much heavier than that very well. Since the onboard graphics chip is Intel, it won't do anything high end in that department.
The system you linked to can accept up to 8 GB's of memory total. As frankbell has mentioned, upgrading it to at least 4 GB's is highly recommended. This will be especially important down the road if you decide to upgrade to newer versions of Xubuntu, which may very well require more system resources.
Hope this helps...
Regards...
Last edited by ardvark71; 10-20-2015 at 10:57 PM.
Reason: Added information/Rewording.
Dual booting does not use more RAM.
The most important requirement for dual booting is you should have enough hard disk space
You can divide the hdd into
100 gb for windows.
4 gb for swap
rest(160-100-4=56)56 gb for linux
The space required for Linux OS installaton will be given in their official Usually with GUI, 30 gb partition will be more than enough.I usually give 100 gb because I store a lot of movies in my linux partition.
Thanks for the great feedback and advice. What I'm thinking is they often have 4GB Dells for around $99. If I want to dual boot I can wait for one of those.
And the $69 one I can get and I can just use it on it's own. (And switch the cables to my Xubuntu.)
You know, there's very few things I need Windows for. In fact, there's nothing I need Windows for. It would just make things easier to have it. (Like Wine only makes ADE 1.7.2 work and there's an ADE 4.something.) It's just so cheap and you get Windows 7, which is not bad compared to Windows 8 and up.
Part of me thinks I want it just because it's so cheap.
---------- Post added 10-21-15 at 05:14 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubankumars
Dual booting does not use more RAM.
The most important requirement for dual booting is you should have enough hard disk space
You can divide the hdd into
100 gb for windows.
4 gb for swap
rest(160-100-4=56)56 gb for linux
The space required for Linux OS installaton will be given in their official Usually with GUI, 30 gb partition will be more than enough.I usually give 100 gb because I store a lot of movies in my linux partition.
You may get your money back if you put the Windows license on eBay. A few years ago I got myself an i5 Thinkpad from eBay (leased and returned, called refurbished) for $200. It had some sort of Vista license. I peeled it off and put it back to the eBay ... got $50 ...
You may get your money back if you put the Windows license on eBay.
This would be illegal, especially if the copy of Windows is OEM, not retail. These versions are non-transferable. If I understand correctly, the copy of Windows is tied to the motherboard. If the motherboard goes out, then that copy of Windows "dies" as well. Please see here under "Transfer of License"--->"Can my customers transfer or sell their OEM software licenses?"
A 160 GB would be more than sufficient to dual boot. 100 for Windows and 80 GB for whatever your linux of choice is plenty. I have Debian w/ KDE including KDE games, gimp, darktable all installed on a machine that has only a 32 GB SSD, and even after allocating 4 GB for swap, have 10 GB+ free space.
This would be illegal, especially if the copy of Windows is OEM, not retail. These versions are non-transferable. If I understand correctly, the copy of Windows is tied to the motherboard. If the motherboard goes out, then that copy of Windows "dies" as well. Please see here under "Transfer of License"--->"Can my customers transfer or sell their OEM software licenses?"
Regards...
eBay is very careful and they allow this, if there is a piece of hardware bundled, like a dead hard drive.
eBay is very careful and they allow this, if there is a piece of hardware bundled, like a dead hard drive.
It also depends on condition. If the device is never booted to Windows by the end user to accept the terms and conditions, then by the absolute letter of the law you are permitted to resell OEM licenses. If it's been used, then no, you are no longer permitted. Usually it's easier to just assume it's NOT legal to sell it, however.
Last edited by Timothy Miller; 10-21-2015 at 06:51 PM.
Not that I care much, but how could the Thinkpad seller sell me the laptop claiming there is a fresh Vista install never booted and I cannot sell the never booted hard drive (cough) with license?
Because it was leased. Which means it was used, thus booted up and therefore the terms & conditions had been accepted. Legally speaking, no, it wasn't legal to sell that OEM license as it had been booted before with the original owner. Unless it was purchased with a NEW OEM license (not the original, which is highly doubtful unless it originally came with XP when first sold), once it's booted and used by the first end user, that license is LEGALLY locked to the motherboard.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.