LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-30-2004, 08:29 AM   #1
berkough
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Distribution: Ubuntu/Slackware
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
window managers, general questions


I'm interested in switching to something like fluxbox or blackbox hoping I can pick up some performance, but what I don't get is how exactly how thoes window managers in particular work.

For instance they both say they offer "GNOME support", but wouldn't the idea of switching to something like Blackbox be so that I can get rid of GNOME, or does it need it to work properly?
 
Old 07-30-2004, 08:38 AM   #2
koyi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu
Posts: 421

Rep: Reputation: 31
AFAIK, black/fluxbox are just window managers which manage the look and the ease of use relating to ONLY windows + a little add-ons, while GNOME is a huge desktop environment which includes many things including a default window manager(i think it is called sawfish or nautilus???).... so you can switch the window manager component(?) of GNOME to other window managers....

On the other hand, if you use black/fluxbox only, you will have the minimum functions to handle your windows and menu.... excluding the icons, GNOME foot mark, etc....

Sorry I couldnt explain it well but you may try it out urself to have better understanding
 
Old 07-30-2004, 09:44 AM   #3
jomen
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Leipzig/Germany
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,687

Rep: Reputation: 54
The "standard" window-manager for Gnome is "sawfish"

I've used fluxbox too - it is a very good and fast window-manager - and fairly easy to configure.
But you will have to configure it, if you want to use it as a working environment - meaning:
you will have to add (almost) every programm you want to access - using just your mouse - yourself to the menus. Once this is done - and this can be a lot of work - it's really easy to use.
But if you still want to use apps from Gnome or kde, there is not much point in using this WM, because what makes gnome and kde a heavy load on the system is the applications themselves - and not the window-manager, that is used to --> manage these (applications) windows.
Gnome or KDE-Support in fluxbox ... does just mean that you can use that WM for managing Gnome/KDE-Applications without loosing the functionality provided by the "standard"-WM's they are designed for.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Window Managers vs Window Shell Environments DJOtaku Linux - General 7 08-09-2005 12:43 PM
Windows managers vs. x vs ..? (general info q) qkslvrwolf Linux - Newbie 5 04-12-2004 03:39 PM
Window Managers vs. Desktop Managers mikeshn Linux - General 4 02-11-2004 11:31 AM
Window Managers? lhiggins Linux - Newbie 5 01-12-2004 11:11 AM
Window Managers finegan Linux - Software 7 08-01-2002 06:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration