LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-08-2005, 09:03 AM   #1
Spider_Mastermind
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Why upgrade?


I did it because it was free and I assumed Mandriva 2006 would be "better" than 2005.

I now realise that for me at least this wasn't a good enough reason. I was quite happy with 2005. It contained DVD burning software out of the tin and also decent e-mail, Internet and office software.

I could not get it to work with Yahoo messenger
I could not get WinMX working
I didn't even bother to try and get any recent games running on it
It would not shut down properly - I still had to use the power button.

....I guess these things are possible/fixable but not at my level of Linux experience(yet).

When I upgraded to 2006 there was a significant reduction in speed and initially no menu or facility to allow second user log in. I managed to fix the latter but not the former.

And I haven't got around to seeing if I can get Yahoo, WinMX or any games running, but these things aren't essential. Though if I could, I could finally say "Bye Bye" to W***ows!

The only benefit is that it can now power itself down properly So I am asking myself why I did it, and think I probably should not have bothered.

Lots of folks on here are running old versions of Linux. I guess they are happy with what they have since they could upgrade for free.

So why upgrade?
Will new applications like the recently released Firefox 1.5 only work with the new kernel?
Am I missing something?
 
Old 12-08-2005, 09:17 AM   #2
vangelis
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Hellas
Distribution: Zenwalk 6.4
Posts: 337
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 30
There are people who upgrade because they want to have top nitch software even though there is nothing amazing. And of course there are ppl who have what they have configured properly and is working fine (like I've become after 2 months of me fighting with SuSE) for them. If someone is happy with his system and doesn't crash or can run all the apps he wants should update only bugs, update fixes and applications that provide new features.
 
Old 12-08-2005, 09:51 AM   #3
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
If your system is working fine and you don't really want to run bleeding edge software, then there is no need to upgrade regularly as long as your distro is recieving security updates. Upgrading any distro is a very complicated process and things may break, thats why most people recommend a clean install unless you are good at troubleshooting and resolving problems.
 
Old 12-08-2005, 10:20 AM   #4
phil.d.g
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,192

Rep: Reputation: 101Reputation: 101
For me there are two main reasons to upgrade: 1) a later version of a particular piece of software has implemented a new feature that I would like to use, and 2) bug/security fixes.

However some people like to upgrade just for the sake of it, or so they can say they are running the latest and greatest version of X
 
Old 12-08-2005, 02:57 PM   #5
jbuckley2004
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Fedora (KDE spin)
Posts: 154

Rep: Reputation: 50
Spider -
I hear that "Kat" really, really slows down Mandriva 2006. I haven't installed 2006 yet, ('cause I'm really happy with 2005, and like a few have said, if it's configured the way you like, don't bother), but I hear that the solution is to uninstall Kat. Then you'll find that 2006 boots noticably faster than 2005, and you'll probably notice that KDE 4.4 is an improvement over KDE 4.3.
Newer hardware will eventually tip the scales in favor of newer versions of the OS, but for me, not yet.

BTW, Firefox 1.5 works wonderfully in 2005, and I suspect it does in 2006 too. It's a definite improvement over Firefox 1.07, even if you've gone through the trouble of optimizing the old version.
 
Old 12-08-2005, 03:55 PM   #6
lostn1slinux
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Suse, Debian, Ubuntu, Mandriva, DSL, Fedora, Redhat Entrerprise
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 15
i only upgrade and tweak just for the sake of something to do.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
apt-get question: dist-upgrade vs upgrade Arodef Fedora 9 06-15-2012 02:33 PM
What first upgrade kernel or upgrade slack 10.0 to current Kelean Slackware 7 01-16-2005 07:54 PM
If I upgrade my hardware do I have to reinstall or upgrade? sephiro499 Mandriva 2 10-20-2004 08:08 AM
upgrade RH8 to RH9 - upgrade or clean install PAB Linux - General 0 03-13-2004 04:55 PM
Error trying to dist-upgrade or upgrade KDE prophet621 Linux - Newbie 0 09-10-2003 05:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration