Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I let synaptic update firefox. It stated it was 184.108.40.206+2nobinonly-0ubuntu1. The description also warned it was a trunk build meant for preview and not production use. When I ran firefox it identifies itself as 220.127.116.11, not 18.104.22.168.
I then installed firefox using ubuntuzilla. It identifies itself as 22.214.171.124.
1. Why isn't the ubuntu package a 126.96.36.199 release?
2. I noticed the firefox and firefox.ubuntu "link to shell script" files in /usr/bin. The first has a target of /opt/firefox/firefox while the second has a target of /usr/lib/firefox/firefox but both seem to launch 188.8.131.52.
I'm getting real confused how to control what executable you run since there are no *.exe's you can just click on, both shell scripts seem identical, and no matter how I try to launch firefox it identifies itself as 184.108.40.206.
I tried to resolve it using the system monitor but it just said "/bin/sh /usr/bin/firefox" for the location. But there is no executable there - just the two links to shell scripts. That seems to imply that after installing the ubuntuzilla copy of firefox the ubuntu version can't ever be run.
Distribution: Arch, CentOS, Fedora, OS X, SLES, Ubuntu
Generally speaking, anything tagged with the words "not for production use" indicate it's not a ready-to-go release i.e. it's a testing/development version and/or meant to be used as a placeholder in the repositories.
I don't know about using ubuntuzilla, so I'm not sure what it might do to your system insofar as paths to the firefox executable etc.
Can you remove the ubuntuzilla package/install and try updating from the official ubuntu repos?
"Can you remove the ubuntuzilla package/install and try updating from the official ubuntu repos?"
Yes, but it would not accomplish anything since I started without ubuntuzilla, using a copy of firefox installed from a ubuntu CD, and then updated it using synaptic from the official ubuntu repository.
I understand what "not for production use" means, I'm used to the tradeoffs of nightly Thunderbird builds under XP for example. I don't understand why a official repository would provide such a build instead of 220.127.116.11. I have security and recommended updates enabled in synaptic - pre-released updates and unsupported updates disabled.
However I'm mainly confused how to control which executable I actually run given that I can't uninstall the ubuntu repositories copies of firefox and thunderbird without serious side effects (since it insists on uninstalling ubuntu-desktop etc. if I do that).