LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-03-2008, 02:43 PM   #1
pockie
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Which Linux OS Do I Want For My Laptop?


I have a pretty low-end laptop that I use as a main PC. It has a 1.8ghz processor, a gig of ram, and a 100 gig hard drive. I'm not sure about the video card or most of the other specs. I don't do gaming, obviously, but I do watch movies and such on it. I was wondering which version of Linux I should use on it. I downloaded Kubuntu, but after seeing just how many others there were, I decided that maybe I should ask around.

Any ideas? Are there more things I should consider?
 
Old 06-03-2008, 02:49 PM   #2
watcher69b
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: /home/watcher69b
Distribution: RH, Fedora & CentOS
Posts: 544

Rep: Reputation: 40
distrowatch.com
is a great place to look.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 02:54 PM   #3
pwc101
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,847

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Second distrowatch. Pick one of the top 10 and try it. I liked Slackware; you may not.

Also: 1.8GHz, 1GB RAM and 100GB HDD is not "pretty low end"! You should see some of my machines...
 
Old 06-03-2008, 03:02 PM   #4
pockie
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Middle-end, then? :P I guess it's just my wishful thinking of having something top of the line that makes me look down on what I have.

But it looks like one of the Ubuntus will be my choice... I just have to decide which.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 03:40 PM   #5
ewolf
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, USA
Distribution: Debian, NetBSD
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Low-end hmm?

I just upgraded to a 1.8Ghz machine.

I don't think you'll have any trouble at all running any modern linux distribution on that setup. If you're particularly concerned with speed and performance but want to stick with Ubuntu, Xubuntu is probably lighter than the KDE or GNOME based ones.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 04:01 PM   #6
divyashree
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: bbsr,orissa,India
Distribution: RHEL5 ,RHEL4,CENT OS5,FEDORA,UBUNTU
Posts: 1,362

Rep: Reputation: 135Reputation: 135
hello brother,use fedora,use mplayer and xine to run all type of video,mp3.
u have 1.83 ghz processor,its enough for fedora,its good u r not playing games.thats all....any problem ,contact me :divyashree_imca@hotmail.com
 
Old 06-03-2008, 07:49 PM   #7
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,053

Rep: Reputation: 881Reputation: 881Reputation: 881Reputation: 881Reputation: 881Reputation: 881Reputation: 881
Quote:
Originally Posted by pockie View Post
But it looks like one of the Ubuntus will be my choice... I just have to decide which.
I don't particularly like Ubuntu, but lots of people do, so give Kubuntu a try.

Do note that you are not deciding against using Gnome Ubuntu (Ubuntu) or Xubuntu by installing Kubuntu. You can install one Ubuntu (err, arrgghh, I mean any of the ubuntus....I wish they'd change the naming convention) and add other gui front ends without de-installing the first one.

You should just have a 'chooser' and one of the buttons on that allows you to choose which gui to boot into.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 08:13 PM   #8
pinniped
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: planet earth
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,732

Rep: Reputation: 50
Aww ... I want a new computer. I thought mine was top end but it's only 1.8GHz with 512M memory.

Debian is pretty easy to maintain with its packaging system and I find the startup scripts and networking setup to be less confusing than RedHat (Mac OSX makes the RedHat setup look very clear and simple though - easy for the point-n-click generation but confusing to an old fogey like me). But since you already have Kubuntu I can't really say you'll gain anything by switching to Debian.
 
Old 06-03-2008, 08:31 PM   #9
Bobber47
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Vector, DSL, Puppy
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 1
relative performance

Kubuntu may be noticeably slower than Ubuntu, which may be noticeably slower than Xubuntu on a modest machine due to relative resource consumption (KDE>Gnome>XFCE). So if you want to maximize responsiveness, Xubuntu would be best. But you can choose alternates later - you'd just have some excess baggage later.

Mint Linux is Ubuntu derived but supposed to have greater OTB support for media, though I haven't tried it myself. Ubuntu support largely applies to it.
 
Old 06-04-2008, 08:37 AM   #10
pockie
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I would prefer to use a KDE system, but I don't have a reason why. I am used to using Fedora/RedHat (Class/Work computers respectively) but I hear that they're not the best for personal use. I guess I probably should have gotten Xubuntu, simply for the responsiveness, but it's not too late; I haven't installed anything yet. I think I'll probably order a new lappy before I do anything.
 
Old 06-04-2008, 08:59 AM   #11
pwc101
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,847

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Try not to think that because a distro comes with a particular desktop environment as default that you can't add another one. For example, in Ubuntu, changing the desktop environment should be as straight forward as
Code:
sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop
Log out, select KDE as the desktop environment, log in and there you go.

Also, Fedora is perfectly suited for personal use. It may be partially true that Red Hat Enterprise Linux installations aren't as tailored to home use, but they are still perfectly usable as desktop OSes.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A local wireless network for sharing files (linux desktop+linux laptop+mac laptop) whyatt Linux - Wireless Networking 1 11-01-2005 04:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration