[SOLVED] Which is the best for text editor on GUI?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
i am looking for text editor on GUI (not terminal command line, please)
So, which is the best text editor beside gedit?
I guess you'll get many different answers because everyone has their own favorite editor.
Mine is Bluefish on Linux, and Programmer's Notepad (PNP) on Windows.
I guess you'll get many different answers because everyone has their own favorite editor.
Mine is Bluefish on Linux, and Programmer's Notepad (PNP) on Windows.
[X] Doc CPU
@Doc CPU thanks for reply
Bluefish, huh? I thought that it almost like Adobe Dreamweaver but it's not only use as web programmer when i read carefully. But also, can be use any purpose.
Bluefish, huh? I thought that it almost like Adobe Dreamweaver but it's not only use as web programmer when i read carefully. But also, can be use any purpose.
I'm sorry I don't fully understand what you mean.
It hurts me a little that you compare Bluefish to Dreamweaver. As I see it, Bluefish is a simple, plain text editor, though it has some comfort like file-type-dependent syntax highlighting. But still, it's a pure text editor. And as such, it can be used to edit configuration files, HTML source files, C code, assembler source or just simple text.
I'm sorry I don't fully understand what you mean.
It hurts me a little that you compare Bluefish to Dreamweaver. As I see it, Bluefish is a simple, plain text editor, though it has some comfort like file-type-dependent syntax highlighting. But still, it's a pure text editor. And as such, it can be used to edit configuration files, HTML source files, C code, assembler source or just simple text.
[X] Doc CPU
Sorry about that, sometimes my English is messed up.
I am just mean that o thought Bluefish is for web programming only, not like making software such as C++, C. But when i visit Bluefish official website and i read an info carefully, it's not just only for web programming but also for any purpose such as C++, C, MySQL and so on.
That's all what i mean.
personally, I like GVim, but it has a rather steep learning curve. Everyone has different preferences though, and my recommendation is that you try out several and see which one you like best.
a (short) list of some editors you might want to look at are:
gvim
emacs
gedit
kate/kwrite
geany
scribes
scite
and the others that have been listed.
Distribution: Fedora14,Scientific 6.1?, Mandriva 2010 ;GO MAGEIA!!!Next up Gentoo
Posts: 698
Rep:
My Personal Favs.
Administrator level Editors or Programmer Level Editors?
Programmer Level:
Emacs is a multi-purpose throwback; in my opinion, which is a bit hard to understand at first. It takes a lot of mental Infrastructure to appreciate it for simple tasks. If you want Mad Programmer Skills , Emacs will put you next to R Stallman eventually if your head does not explode first.
VIM is more practical and is usually installed native along with Nano. Both Emacs and VIM have a crazy amount of configurations that I don't think can justify NOT altering your own behaviour a twinge. A Short Cut to correct accidentally reversed letters in a word??? This would be too much configuration.
Administrator Level:
Kate
Krite
Nano
I don't think Nano gets the exposure that it deserves.
I don't think Nano gets the exposure that it deserves.
you may be right, but then nano is a pure console application, while the thread starter explicitly asked for a "text editor on GUI (not terminal command line, please)". Except there is another editor called nano that I don't know.
That said, nano is my standard editor on systems that have no GUI, like a GNU system with no X installed, or over a remote console. I don't see, however, why you would rate it that good. It's a text editor, alright. It works and it's fairly comfortable to use, but there is nothing really worth mentioning about it. - My two cents in turn.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.