Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hi
I have create a new partition to hold /tmp directory.
The question is: which is the best filesystem for /tmp and which mount options.
I am using reiserfs with notail and noatime options in fstab.
thanks.
hi
I have create a new partition to hold /tmp directory.
Why???
A Linux install does not benefit from having many partitions without specific reasons.
The only time you would need to use any filesystem except the one for the main tree would be for a shared data partition (FAT32 to share easily with Windows)
On servers it is useful to have /tmp mounted noexec and nosuid (as was mentioned above). If it's a plain normal /tmp partition then there's no real reason to do anything more special. If you're expecting to use it very intently, you might be interested in looking at XFS or ReiserFS, particularly if you'll be creating lots and lots (like tens of thousands) of small files. Those filesystems have a reputation for being particularly goos with that sort of workload.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.