Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Im running RH 7.2 and whould like to know where the best directory to install software. Like Star Office for example... by default it wants to stick it in subdirectory in my home directory. Maybe im to used to the windows way of doing things but is there a *nix equivelant to "Program Files"?
Would /usr/local be a better place?
if your installnig as a user then it will install to your home, but as root it'll go for /usr/local. unless it doesn't.... maybe it's weird. if so, /usr/local is a very god place for it. generally all normal prgrams (i.e. NOT staroffice etc..) will install nicely into your /usr branch fine. there's very seldom a casue to change the dafult
An impressive document to consider (although I don't know how closely it is followed by the major distributions) is the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard. It covers what should be where, and poses a good argument for having most of your system running from a CD so that it cannot be overwritten.
It recommends /usr/local or /opt for additional software like StarOffice.
The idea of running "much of the stytem" from CD is intriguing and would certainly provide bulletprooof over write protection, but isn't there a substantial performance hit? Speed is one of my main issues with Linux, espeially in GNOME, as it is. Not crazy about going back to command line entry; reminds me too much of Hollerith cards, I guess. Any thoughts?
The Linux kernel will be loaded from the CD into memory at boot time so there won't be a loss of speed from that. The only thing you might notice is a slight delay in loading new apps because the CD has to spin up.
The problems you're seeing in GNOME are more than likely not caused by the read time of the particular device you have the software loaded on. It's probably more of a problem with running too much at once. Even if you don't think you have a lot running, there may be more daemons than you think in the background. Not to mention that the primary goal of GNOME was not speed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.