[SOLVED] What's the difference between i586 vs. x86_64 version of linux software?
Linux - NewbieThis forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
i586 will run on Pentium class processors and all subsequent models, including the recent x86_64 Intel and AMD processors.
x86_64 will run only on x86_64 architecture.
i586 refers to classic pentium, the one that came after 486dx. Any x86 cpu that is equal or superior to the original pentium can run i586 code. So, it's certainly possible to run code compiled for 586 on your cpu. The pentium was a 32 bits processor, so the software compiled for 586 runs in 32 bits mode.
x86_64 is a superset of x86, which extends the word size to 64 bits. x86_64 cpus can still run x86 code without a problem, but they can run 64 bits code as well.
So, your cpu can run in 64 bits mode or 32 bits mode, whatever suits you.
I'm setting up Suse Linux Enterprise 10.2. Is that a good OS?
For what purpose?
Are you setting up Linux as a web server? A database server? A file server? A multi-user system to be used remotely?
Or are you setting up a single user workstation or ordinary home system?
"Enterprise" tends to mean a server of some kind. If you are setting up a home system, selecting any "Enterprise" version of Linux is likely to confuse you.
For a home system, I greatly prefer Mepis. Ubuntu is similar to Mepis and is much more popular and is another good choice for a home system (though I think Mepis is more beginner friendly).
For a server, I have very limited experience using Suse (and no experience installing it). I think Centos is a better choice for a server.
Last edited by johnsfine; 07-10-2009 at 01:10 PM..
Are you setting up Linux as a web server? A database server? A file server? A multi-user system to be used remotely?
Or are you setting up a single user workstation or ordinary home system?
"Enterprise" tends to mean a server of some kind. If you are setting up a home system, selecting any "Enterprise" version of Linux is likely to confuse you.
For a home system, I greatly prefer Mepis. Ubuntu is similar to Mepis and is much more popular and is another good choice for a home system (though I think Mepis is more beginner friendly).
For a server, I have very limited experience using Suse (and no experience installing it). I think Centos is a better choice for a server.
I am setting up a single user workstation. Suse Linux Enterprise is the generic name of the software.
I am setting up a single user workstation. Suse Linux Enterprise is the generic name of the software.
I've only used Suse (on a system someone else installed). I never tried to download or install it.
So I have no clue what versions of Suse are available, nor how much of my negative experience with Suse is a result of errors made by the individual who installed it.
So just one partial and anecdotal data point. You asked whether it was a good choice (for a beginner single user workstation) and I gave my opinion that it is not.
For an experienced Linux user, a lot of the differences between distributions don't matter. I'm sure someone who knows Linux just a little better than I do could install a good single user workstation from Centos or any other Enterprise distribution and/or install a good server from Mepis.
But I think a beginner is better off selecting a more targeted distribution. Mepis is very well targeted to typical Linux beginners who tend to have Windows experience and who want to do ordinary home computer things (web browsing, video editing, communicating with a Windows based home network, and many other things). All those things can be done with any other linux distribution as well. But in most cases you need to first learn more about being a Linux system administrator than an ordinary home user wants to learn.
Suse Linux Enterprise 10.2 has different download from OpenSuse 10.2. The Enterprise is a supported version and Open Suse is not, I think.
After a frustrating time installing Suse Linux Enterprise 10.2 (fails in the hardware configuration step, the last step), I decided to use Open Suse 10.3. It is now working. Thanks to all of you guys!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.