Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Just to get this thread whole on its own.
I read the link Tinkster provided but this did not really answer the question about the dot. I could assume that the dot is an indicator that this file has extended attributes.. Right?
@ Tinkster: Thank you ! You're right. It is indeed, extended attributes.
@ divyashree: NO, I am talking about the dot AFTER the regular file permission field. Thanks for the answer anyway.
@ saagar: yes, I never see such dot. I already have seen a '+' (ACL), but not a '.' And as Tinkster has pointed it is a extended attribute. In this case I can get its value by "getfattr --dump". Cool !
@ zhjim: thanks for the summary. Yes, it is similar to ACL notation. You can get all extended attributes by "getfattr --dump"
thanks for all !
PS: I would like to add that extended attribute was not set by my-self, but by one of several exotic file manager I am trying with.
Now, answering my own doubt what may have happened is that I had selinux enabled (default in Fedora) and then I disabled it. So files that have been indexed by selinux may have had the dot and the ones created afterwards don't have them. Just a guess.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.