Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I want to know what type of Linux would run well on a laptop with only 133 MHz Pentium CPU and 64 MB RAM.
any small distro, Damn Small Linux, Slackware, Controlled Debian Install, Linux From Scratch, Rock Linux, etc... Just stay away from the more "we do everything for you" distros and if you want to use X try to use really light managers. Just be minimalistic, i've gotten debian working on desktop computers with similar stats easily, but because i'm most comfortable with debian and know what i'm doing. Choose a small one and the one you feel most comfortable with. If you don't want to spend too much time compiling use some binary distro, or use another computer to compile it for you, because slow computers are really slow compiling, took me over a day to get a kernel compiled on a computer once, in comparison to the hour my "good" computer takes.
Should I switch distros? I use Fedora 4, and all I need is something really simple, graphical, and easy. I don't like Fedora that much, but a friend convinced me. Can you recommend any distros, and where I can find them? I have a Dell Pentium 3 tower, 512 MB ram, 40 GB hard drive, with 20 external. Not sure what speed, but FC4 took about 15 minutes to install with the default apps and features.
Should I switch distros? I use Fedora 4, and all I need is something really simple, graphical, and easy. I don't like Fedora that much, but a friend convinced me. Can you recommend any distros, and where I can find them? I have a Dell Pentium 3, 512 MB ram, 40 GB hard drive, with 20 external.
Read the distro reviews from here LQ. Distros are all up to taste, altough in some cases you can't use some because they are too resource consuming. Just read reviews and such. I'd say debian, because it's what i know best, but i'm also thinking about trying more, just got to get my test rig working again and time to try new ones. With those specs you probably will be able to run any distro except some very resource consuming, but then of course i don't know any that wouldnt work with that.
I had FC4 on a similar setup and was quite happy with it. In order to be able to advise you on a 'better' distro for you you 'll have to explain why you don't like it and what you expect from your distro.