Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I installed slack 10 everything is A-ok. Except I found out /usr/src did not
have 2.4.28 tar.bz2--I was looking for /usr/src/linux. So I downloaded it.
I made a directory called linux-2.4.28. I cd'd into this unbzipped. Then another directory was made, linux-2.4.28. It's redundant directory name. Will this naming affect my recompiling efforts in the future?
i think the kernel source directory has to be the actual compile directory where your kernel was built
not just a fresh source download
your distribution had no doubt a package kernel-source or whatever that is proper and installs to the right place.
The kernel can be built anywhere and the build directory will work just fine
/usr/src/linux is something left over from days long gone and was traditionally just a symbolic link to the current running kernel source directory -- this is no longer needed -- but shouldn't hurt anything
the proper link now is made when you install the kernel and is in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build