Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Today i received a email from Red Hat , telling me that there was a errata alert ,so i quiet happily started the up2date process.
About 3-4 minutes into the download i receive a message saying,
" The package does not have a valid GPG signature . It has been tampered with or is corrupted continue ? "
Now do i continue and not know for sure that , this package is not going to cause havoc on my box ?
Why would RH send me a email telling me to download such n such package , when it could be corrupt ?
Doesn't RH check these things before releasing packages to the public ?
As I'm new to the linux world . if someone could explain why this happens and if its safe to continue downloading , i might gain a better understanding on how these things work .
A bad phone line could do it, try saving the download someplace where it wont't be overwritten by the next one and compare the downloads to see if they are the same (RH puts them in /var/spool/up2date by default on my machine). If you get consistently bad downloads, you could also download the rpm from a mirror and then use up2date with the -k<paths to package> option with up2date. The mirrors often provide better download speeds (even on dialup) and relieve lots of load on the RH servers. (Not that I should care anymore now that up2date is considered a "demo service" to those not paying a monthly fee).
Yeah your problem with up2date is that the redhat servers are bogged down at the moment. This causes packages to corrupt while downloading. You can either wait until the smoke clears on there servers or apt-get for rpm as ven0m suggested.
Yeah your problem with up2date is that the redhat servers are bogged down at the moment. This causes packages to corrupt while downloading
Download corruption is not related to Red Hat Network being busy. It happens to some users also during other times. Access to Red Hat Network is prioritized. A demo user would be rejected if RHN is too busy serving paying customers.
The way to remove the bad download is to delete the file in /var/spool/up2date and then rerun up2date. Or you download the updates from an FTP/HTTP mirror of updates.redhat.com and put them into /var/spool/up2date where up2date will pick them up.
Originally posted by AXO
p.s Is RH starting to sound like another OS i know of ,
That comparison is beyond my comprehension. What has changed? If you'd like to, you can still get the distribution and all its updates for free. Even "free" as in "free beer". That's unusual for a NASDAQ-listed company, isn't it? As long before, updates are still available on many FTP/HTTP servers world-wide. Nobody forces you to use Red Hat Network and its up2date tool. Nobody forces you to use Red Hat Linux either.
Pick and support the distribution/distributor you like best.