Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
ok i am going to start this by saying just what i have read on other sites... I have read that the second number that discribes the kernel tells if it is stable or not. well i was looking around my system and it said the version was 2.17.23 (the 23 i am not 7sure of but i know the 2.17 is right) could this be why i am having the problems i am having? and if so how can i upgrade to a stable kernel?
whether or not to upgrade kinda depends on what you want to do with your system. if you have some features, like usb, that you want to use, then upgrading would probably be a good idea, since usb support is much better on the 2.4 branch than on the 2.2 branch. but, unless you're looking for something specific to add to or upgrade on your system, then you're probably fine with the older kernel.
also, if you have a 2.2.17-???? kernel, then upgrading might be a good idea. many times, distro's have thier own specially-modified kernels, but i've heard of people having a lot of trouble with those.
ok... lets say i do want to upgrade kernels...is that a relatively easy thing to do? or should i just wait until i can get a copy of mandrake 8.0 and go that route? which one is the easist for a newbie like me?
have a great day
you might want to check out this thread, i put my opinion or easiest way in on getting a new kernel upgrade on how about getting the kernel installed. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...&threadid=5225
well, for newbies, i think its good to learn and get a hang of it... cause your gonna do it in the future most likely. but yeah, depending on what your doing with your system.. sometimes there might not ever be a reason for someone to update their kernel.
hey there thanx that helped a lot. I tried looking for it thru the forums but guess i looked so long my eyes went cross on me yaknow how it is lol. well thanx aagain. BTW I have a nw mandrake 8.0 disk and a few other goodies ordered so that i can install it on my new computer whenever that happens that way i can start with a "fresh" disk just in case u r right and i overused the disks i have lol
have a great day