LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2012, 08:33 PM   #1
ceantuco
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: CentOS, Debian, Mint, Backtrack, OpenSuse
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 36
Question Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Fedora or OpenSuse


Hi Guys,

Ive been using Ubuntu since version 8.04 but I don't like version 11 and 12. I have version 12.04 LTS currently installed on my laptop. i3 processor, 4GB or ram, etc etc. Ubuntu runs slow sometimes. Also, Ive gotten a few Crash Reports (reminds me of M$crosoft). Which Distro would you guys recommend? I need something like Ubuntu 10. Keyboard friendly with all shortcuts (alt+tab, altf4,f2,f1, etc)
Thank you
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 06-01-2012, 10:01 PM   #2
TroN-0074
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,430

Rep: Reputation: 339Reputation: 339Reputation: 339Reputation: 339
actually since you are already familiar with a Linux distribution you should try to move up on more stable distributions such as Debian or SlackWare.
In my opinion if you install Linux Mint, OpenSuSE or Fedora you wont be moving too far from Ubuntu in the sense that all these are put together with a corporate environment in mind.
Slackware and Debian will give you the freedom to install the software you want in your computer.
Good luck to you.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-01-2012, 10:25 PM   #3
CincinnatiKid
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Distribution: Mageia-3
Posts: 399

Rep: Reputation: 33
Why not give Mageia a try? I would not try Mint, I tried it and many basic features were not available, like creating a desktop shortcut to a program. I am not kidding, I have 10 years of Linux experience with gobs of distros including Slackware, LFS, Gentoo. I posted on LQ and no one could figure out how to create a desktop shortcut. It is like it was so oversimplified not even a caveman can figure out how to use it.
 
Old 06-01-2012, 11:04 PM   #4
theKbStockpiler
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Central New York
Distribution: Fedora14,Scientific 6.1?, Mandriva 2010 ;GO MAGEIA!!!Next up Gentoo
Posts: 836

Rep: Reputation: 51
In my opinion Fedora is a Moderate Distro and Suse tries to overcome Linux Shortfalls but it makes it bloated. Suse is definitely different and for that reason is worth trying out to get your own perspective of it. If you like what I think is a Linux answer to Windows ,try the Mandrake forks of Mandriva/Mageia. Mandriva 2008 was awesome ,Mandriva 2010 was the most appealing interface I have ever used and I have a solid install of Mageia 1 currently.
 
Old 06-02-2012, 12:26 AM   #5
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,522

Rep: Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805Reputation: 1805
unless you build it from the ground up
think Gentoo or Slack
Arch is good IF you WANT to use a prebuilt and install ONLY what you want
it has it's good and bad points

Fedora ??? well fedora is , well "fedora" what can one say .

OpenSUSE ?? good points - it just works Except for Gnome3 gnome 3 is well a P.O.S. ( a #2 and smells like it also)

Bloated yes, but some things can be removed though not much .


put it this way my mom that has a hard time with yahoo mail is using opensuse 11.4 ( i will be upgrading her this summer)

OpenSUSE is a rpm based distro and NOT a .deb system
suse uses "zypper" and NOT yum , though yum can be installed
 
Old 06-02-2012, 04:46 AM   #6
grail
Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 7,698

Rep: Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988Reputation: 1988
I am not sure of the others but would also warn you off Linux Mint as I have used it for a number of months now and had repeated crashes that I have been unable to solve.

Another option to Slackware if too heavy for you is to try Salix which comes with its own front end installer which seems not bad.
 
Old 06-02-2012, 06:55 AM   #7
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729
For many users, I think the "best" distro is often the last one they try. I think there are too many variables for anyone to advise someone else on what is "best".

Since joining LQ, I've probably done about 100 Linux installs, and most of them have had some kind of major or minor annoyance. Most recently, I am **really** turned off by some of the fluff that people are inventing for the GUI (gnome-shell, for starters).

I used to suggest that anything in the "top ten" at distrowatch would be a safe bet, but there's Arch in 7th place--and that is NOT a distro for an inexperienced user.

So---my answer to the original question is "try it"
 
Old 06-02-2012, 09:00 AM   #8
TroN-0074
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,430

Rep: Reputation: 339Reputation: 339Reputation: 339Reputation: 339
I have to point out two things here.

1) I dont think OP is inexperienced since he pointed out in post #1 he has been using Ubuntu since 8.04, so I am assuming he could handle the command line on any other distro, Debian and Slackware being the most reliable for stability I suggested them.

2) I see some of the suggestions are being based on graphical interface. Keep in mind that in Linux there are different graphical environment and you can easily change it without having to change distro at all. KDE, Xfce, LXDE and lot more still let you put icons on the desktop.

Perhaps Package manager is a better subject when considering trying a different distro .deb, or rpm,. apt or yum, YaST or Synaptic

Good luck to you!

Last edited by TroN-0074; 06-02-2012 at 05:27 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-02-2012, 11:45 AM   #9
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 3,229

Rep: Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825
It all depends on why you used to like Ubuntu and why you don't like it now. Since you stopped liking it with version 11, perhaps it was the change from Gnome to Unity that was the last straw? If so, try Linux Mint Maté version:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...p/product/2188
It's certainly faster, but there is the current encryption problem (unless I was just unlucky there).

Another possibility is Solus:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...page/15/sort/7
 
Old 06-02-2012, 04:34 PM   #10
kareempharmacist
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Cairo Egypt
Distribution: CrunchBang,Linux Mint,Slackopuppy
Posts: 269

Rep: Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroN-0074 View Post
actually since you are already familiar with a Linux distribution you should try to move up on more stable distributions such as Debian or SlackWare.
In my opinion if you install Linux Mint, OpenSuSE or Fedora you wont be moving too far from Ubuntu in the sense that all these are put together with a corporate environment in mind.
Slackware and Debian will give you the freedom to install the software you want in your computer.
Good luck to you.
I agree with you..
 
Old 06-02-2012, 05:06 PM   #11
kareempharmacist
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Cairo Egypt
Distribution: CrunchBang,Linux Mint,Slackopuppy
Posts: 269

Rep: Reputation: 18
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by TroN-0074 View Post
I have to point out two things here.

1) I dont think OP is inexperience since he pointed out in post #1 he has been using Ubuntu since 8.04, so I am assuming he could handle the command line on any other distro, Debian and Slackware being the most reliable for stability I suggested them.

2) I see some of the suggestions are being based on graphical interface. Keep in mind that in Linux there are different graphical environment and you can easily change it without having to change distro at all. KDE, Xfce, LXDE and lot more still let you put icons on the desktop.

Perhaps Package manager is a better subject when considering trying a different distro .deb, or rpm,. apt or yum, YaST or Synaptic

Good luck to you!
wise answer from wise user
 
Old 06-03-2012, 12:44 AM   #12
alabamaman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: linux-noobville.d/dfw texas
Distribution: grub multi-booter
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 16
I asked this same question when I first started using Linux years ago. Instead of installing one distro after another and seeing what I liked/didn't like, I just decided to partition out my drive and make a multi-boot machine. It's not really too complicated, and there is plenty of good documentation on how to do it without a giant headache. I personally like Fedora, because it tends to be the least PITA, but that's just my opinion. It's all about finding your flavor.
 
Old 06-03-2012, 12:05 PM   #13
ceantuco
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: CentOS, Debian, Mint, Backtrack, OpenSuse
Posts: 560

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 36
Hi Guys, thank you very much for your responses. I tried Linux mint and yes, there was a few things I couldn't do or modify. Like I said I am a keyboard guy, I barely use the mouse and having to use the mouse in Gnome3 is just driving me nuts. I will give Debian a shot. I also noticed that Debian is widely used in corporations and most Linux Admin jobs require knowledge in Debian so I think Debian will be a much better distro for me to try. Do I have to download all 7 Debian DVD ISOs to be able to install it? Thanks
 
Old 06-03-2012, 01:01 PM   #14
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 3,229

Rep: Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825Reputation: 825
No, the full set of DVDs are for people who want their own repository because they can't get broadband (or even any internet). You can install with the first disk.
 
Old 06-03-2012, 01:11 PM   #15
ceantuco
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: CentOS, Debian, Mint, Backtrack, OpenSuse
Posts: 560

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 36
Thank you! Im downloading the first disk now.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a substantial difference between Linux Mint Ubuntu and Linux Mint Debian? schachwizard Linux Mint 4 10-10-2010 12:27 AM
How do I replace Linux Mint with Suse 11.0 on PC with Win XP Mint and Ubuntu? jremsen Linux - Software 4 02-15-2009 07:54 AM
LXer: Tracking Linux prereleases: OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, and Fedora LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-24-2008 12:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration