LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2004, 05:18 AM   #1
TTL_2
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
The best filesystem for a partition if data savety is important


Hello,
I have a 100GB partition and don't know which filesystem is the best. Speed is not important because the linux system and /home are on other partitions, so the files are not accessed very often. Unfortunately making a 100GB backup with a dvd writer is not very comfortable. The loss of data after a forgotten unmounting (for example after a reset) should be as low as possible, also the linux 2.4 kernel should not have any problems with the filesystem. For example I've read that writing NTFS is not safe with linux.
Based on a message in this forum ( threadid=196935 ; I'm not allowed to post links within my first postings , no one told me so I needed to rewrite the whole message :-( ) I thing ResizerFS would be the right filesystem. Finally it would be nice if there are some driver for the filesystem for read access under Windows9x.
Is ResizerFS the right choice or exists there a better filesystem?
Thank you in advanced.
 
Old 07-03-2004, 05:45 AM   #2
whansard
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Mosquitoville
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,185

Rep: Reputation: 52
probably ext3. best documented, and the filesystem checking tools work well.
 
Old 07-03-2004, 09:01 AM   #3
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
I'd personally go with ext3. Reiser is probably faster, but I think ext2 is more robust. There are other filesystems as well, but ext3 can be read by windows (at least at an ext2 level)...
 
Old 09-18-2006, 04:02 AM   #4
joethegeek
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
ext3 can be read by windows? how?

greethings
johannes
 
Old 09-18-2006, 05:25 AM   #5
whansard
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Mosquitoville
Distribution: RH 6.2, Gen2, Knoppix,arch, bodhi, studio, suse, mint
Posts: 3,185

Rep: Reputation: 52
http://ext2read.sourceforge.net/

that's one way anyhow.
 
Old 09-18-2006, 10:17 AM   #6
soggycornflake
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Slamd64
Posts: 249

Rep: Reputation: 31
I've used reiser for years without any problems. Recently I've been trying out xfs. I don't think there is a huge difference reliability-wise, any journaling fs will be OK, reiser/ext3/xfs.

However, no fs can protect you from hardware failure, you will still need to back it up, which is a whole other subject.
 
Old 09-18-2006, 12:25 PM   #7
haertig
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, LinuxMint, Slackware, SysrescueCD
Posts: 2,117

Rep: Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by TTL_2
Unfortunately making a 100GB backup with a dvd writer is not very comfortable.
It may not be comfortable for you, but it's absolutely mandatory to backup if your data is at all important to you. No other way around it. Choosing a journeling filesystem with a proven track record is all well and good (I'd personally choose ext3 for that myself), but to leave it at that and consider yourself well protected is just pure folly.

For a minimal hassle and cost recommendation, I'd say buy yourself an external disk and backup to that. Make sure that disk is cleanly unmounted, totally disconnected, and stored off site (a bank safe-deposit box?) if you're even minorly serious about protecting your files. For really important irreplaceable data, you need multiple redundant backups stored in geographically diverse locations. And you need to practice and verify restores from these backups from time to time.

Is your data really important to you? If so, you just have to bite the bullet and do some "uncomfortable" stuff to protect yourself. There's no shortcut.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VFAT Data Recovery - Important!! ar1 Linux - General 3 06-04-2005 09:27 PM
Why is the partition id important? LinuxGeek Linux - General 10 01-10-2005 05:08 PM
Possible to make filesystem on disk with data written to it? redhatman Linux - Newbie 3 08-28-2004 11:49 AM
Recover Data in Dead ReiserFS Filesystem Schultz Linux - Newbie 4 10-15-2003 05:18 PM
problem in getting free data blocks in filesystem udayan Programming 4 07-07-2002 02:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration