Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I just installed Redhat 9 on a Celeron 333 with 64M RAM. I was so excited to install it that I never thought about the system requirements. Anyway, the install took and it works, but the hd thrashes too much. I know this has something to do with the swap file being used too much due to lack of physical ram. Anyway, my questions is this. I really want to learn more about linux, but what version will run well on the hardware that I have? Maybe I didn't look hard enough, but I could never find system requirements on redhat's site. Thanks for the input. --wxnut
BlackBox is included in 9.0 and 9.1, if you want Flux included, that is in 9.1, otherwise you have to download, install, and setup, which isn't too much work, but can still get difficult at times for someone who has never done it (i had lots of problems my first time with a Flux install).
There's a Fluxbox.tgz somewhere on the net now isn't there? I'm pretty sure thats how I installed when I ran 9... I might be wrong though. However I did it, it was trouble free. If you try 9, just start out with Blackbox and see what you think. Take a look at their website beforehand to get an idea what its all about, as it is nothing like what you are used to from Windows
fyi: .tgz extentions are whats commonly referred to as "Slack Packs." Slack Packs are just preconfigured software packages optimized for the Slackware distro which make for an easy install.
Yes, if you go to the Flux website, there is a Slack Pack for it. It's not to hard to actually get installed,.. its the initial configuration of it that gets a little difficult if you've never done it...
Another solution is to look for an older version of one of the more popular relases on an auction site. SuSE 6.4, older versions of Redhat, etc. They are designed to run on slow machines, and you can probably get one pretty cheap because people have upgraded and dont want them anymore.
Ram is cheap, you are not going to get X to run like you want it on 64MB. If you can't afford the ram then just be aware that you are going to need to open only one thing at a time and see how your memory holds out. With mozilla there are memory cache settings that may help if you turn it off. It will slow down browsing a bit but the system will have more ram. My Mozilla uses about 34MB on it's own.
I think Redhat 7.3 would kick butt on your system. That is my favorite version of Redhat. I think that Slackware would be great if it doesn't discourage you (9.1 would work great with a bit more RAM). If you want a small distro that is fast, Peanut Linux is great too
If you up the RAM to at least 128 or 160 it would run much better.