Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I was thinking about downloading Partition Image http://www.partimage.org/download.en.html and
I was wondering what the difference is between
the source and the binary file. Do they both need the
typical ./configure, make, make install commands to
Install?
The binary is the installer, the source is the source.
If you don't care about compiling it yourself, you just need the binary. It's handy to get both sometimes though, as you might run into the binary needing to be compiled for your kernel version.
some sofware distribution s run directly form binary, without any installation process..
as seventh says, when you dont need to do any specific change in the program, or at least you dont need any specifif installtion you can use binary distirbution...
But the meaning of free software is having the source, huh?
I got the binary version of the app. Just un tar'ed it and it worked fine. Yes, free software is having the source code with it. But I'm anything but a programmer so I don't really need it anyway.
Generally speaking, if you have a binary which was compiled for your specific distribution you should have little trouble running it. These are often compiled to accomodate the widest range of users, though, so sometimes you might have problems...if you're running a custom kernel or have conflicting applications installed, for example. In these situations it may be better to compile the program from source.
Personally i prefer the source approach, though occasionally I find an application that gives me trouble during the build. If it's worth the effort to find out why , then I'll attempt to fix it. If not, I'll try a precompiled binary. This isn't really the best choice though, imo, since it seems these binaries are more likely to crash or have performance issues. If there are problems in the compile, this may be the result of software conficts...simply using a precompiled binary is the equivalent of a bandage rather than a cure.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.