Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
05-27-2004, 11:24 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Rep:
|
Small, easy to use and stable Distro?
Hi everyone!
I no this has most likely been asked before, but i have had a look and could not find a answer.
I need a small distro that will be on 24/7, used as a gateway to the internet (so must be easy to set up to a dial\ADSL line) and to store files. It will be set up in a mirrored array and i would like it to be less that one gig in size. I have used RedHat 9, but as its not supported anymore and im not sure where to go? There has been so much news about large companies buying small Linux distros im not sure what one to pick that will still be around in the future AND still ran by the community.
I would like a distro with a GUI and is easy to use like RedHat 9, as i am new to Linux.
Your help is appreciated,
Tim
|
|
|
|
05-27-2004, 11:41 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: nottingham england
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,672
Rep:
|
how about fedora core 2.
if you are accustomed to redhat 9, then the transition will be easy.
fedora core 2 is is pretty much the same as redhat 9 in my opinion.
well... its got a completely different kernel, and uses all the up to date packages.
and looks alot nicer.. (also performs quite a bit better too)
things like the services interface, and network contoll interface are very very similar.
if you were happy with redhat 9, then definatly go for fedora core 2.
|
|
|
|
05-27-2004, 11:46 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for your advice.
Its just i herd alot about other distros, i thought it would be a good time to change?
If you think it will be ok, then i will give it ago.
I would like to hear anyone else opinion...
|
|
|
|
05-27-2004, 05:53 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Rep:
|
Try Debian or Mandrake 10
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 04:08 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for youe input, could you tell me why you think that? And why to choose one of them over the fedora core 2.
Thanks, im just trying to get as much info as i can, as the one i choose i will most likey use for life!
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 07:22 AM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 18
Rep:
|
Well ii'm rather new too and installed both Fedora Core 1 and Mandrake 10. Between the two, they're equally easy to install. But i've found Mandrake had alot more things actually working straight out of the box. Fedora required me to install alot of extras to make even basic stuff like MP3s work.
If space is really a problem try something like Knoppix, which is a live-on-cd distro [no installation, runs totally from cd]. I think it's based on Debian, so probably a good way to test how good that works without changing your system. And if you need to go even smaller, i found a little distro called Feather Linux which is only 64MB and runs from my USB flashdisk [boots from it and all that]. Fun :P
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 07:26 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for your advice!
Space is not that much of a problem for me, less that 1 Gig if fine. (that CD linux does sound fun!)
Im not to worried about playing mp3 and stuff as the box will just be a file server and share access to the internet.
Thank you again and i would love to hear anyone elses opinion
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 07:56 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Rep:
|
Supposedly Fedora will be a community release forever, but who knows. Debian is the only distro set up that way. It should never die. Mandrake has always been free as well, so even if the company goes bankrupt, the source will live on. There are others, butof the ones I have tried so far, they have the most complete sets of software and they are both well-supported. I have had good luck with them as well. I have tried Slackware and tis marvelous (if you install swaret the minute you get on the net), but the learning curve is high. If you have the time to compile, Gentoo has a decent install as well. Of the 20 or so distros and Windows versions, and FreeBSD and NetBSD variants, that I have installed and used, when my hard drive crapped out and left me with the little 4 giger on the shelf, I installed Mandrake 10 as my main working OS.
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 08:10 AM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Location: Russell Island Q.L.D
Distribution: Slackware 12
Posts: 28
Rep:
|
Hello
You could try Xandros desktop 2 easy to use easy to configure and the people on the forum are helpful. Take a Look at www.xandros.com
and here http://forums.xandros.com/
good luck
Mathew
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 08:41 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for your post.
But im looking for an open source distro
|
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 10:36 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 855
Rep:
|
Morphix?
I suggest trying morphix - http://www.morphix.org/. I downloaded it recently, took it for a spin, and am actually impressed. It is a Debian-based Live-CD, which can also be installed to a HD. It's auto-detection is brilliant. My sometimes tricky cable modem was detected instantly. I was impressed with the amount of software they crammed into it.
The current version is not yet on a 2.6 kernel, but they are working on it.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi guys
Thank you for your help so far.
Now i am thinking of choosing Mandrake or Fedora, but there was one thing i forgot to say! The processor will only be 333Mhz, what one do you think will run best!
Thanks again
Tim
|
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 12:34 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: N.C.
Distribution: rh9, fc1, slack 9.1, 10
Posts: 229
Rep:
|
you could run either of those most likely on that processor without much problem. where you might run into problems is the amount of ram. to run smoothly on such an old system, it is often the case that you have to really trim the kernel, as it resides in memory at all times, and a bloated kernel doesn't leave much room for apps in your ram, causing you to use lots of swap which runs off of disk and is MUCH slower. also, you might look into running a smaller desktop environment/window manager, as kde 3.2 will likely CRAWL on that system if you get it running.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London UK
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for your reply
I did use RedHat on a 500Mhz CPU and it ran SO SLOW! That had 128MB of RAM.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 12:40 PM
|
#15
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,756
|
How about Trustix. Based on RH, no GUI but depending on installed packages only about 300mb.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|