LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2009, 12:44 AM   #1
nathan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: california
Distribution: fedora
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
Showing below warning frequently..?


Hi All,


I Have Installed Fedora 10 on my machine. I am getting below warning very frequently on right side below on my PC. Like Internal System error occured.
Below is the complete details.

Kindly suggest me the solution to avoid this. Is it will crash the system ?


Error Type: <class 'yum.Errors.RepoError'>
Error Value: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: fedora. Please verify its path and try again
File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 2202, in <module>
main()
File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 2199, in main
backend.dispatcher(sys.argv[1:])
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py, line 599, in dispatcher
self.dispatch_command(args[0], args[1:])
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py, line 503, in dispatch_command
self.get_distro_upgrades()
File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 1660, in get_distro_upgrades
pkgs = self.yumbase.pkgSack.returnNewestByName(name='preupgrade&apos
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/__init__.py, line 592, in <lambda>
pkgSack = property(fget=lambda self: self._getSacks(),
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/__init__.py, line 435, in _getSacks
self.repos.populateSack(which=repos)
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/repos.py, line 251, in populateSack
sack.populate(repo, mdtype, callback, cacheonly)
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py, line 160, in populate
if self._check_db_version(repo, mydbtype):
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py, line 217, in _check_db_version
return repo._check_db_version(mdtype)
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py, line 1119, in _check_db_version
repoXML = self.repoXML
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py, line 1277, in <lambda>
repoXML = property(fget=lambda self: self._getRepoXML(),
File : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py, line 1273, in _getRepoXML
raise Errors.RepoError, msg




Thanks in advance
Nathan
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:15 AM   #2
r3sistance
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Distribution: CentOS 5.4, Mac OS 10.4 (tiger)
Posts: 1,005

Rep: Reputation: 79
When do these errors tend to occur? all the time/randomly, when the system tries to run updates or when you use yum?

I suspect there is something wrong with either yum or python, but given the errors it's also possible the yum repositories are wrong. Can you try and use yum and see if it produces errors with antyhing more meaningful.
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:39 AM   #3
chrism01
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Centos 6.8, Centos 5.10
Posts: 17,241

Rep: Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325Reputation: 2325
Just FYI, F10 will expire shortly, December this yr if F12 release goes according to plan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_...ting_system%29
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle

in the meanwhilst, you could try

yum clean all

It could just be a temp glitch that you can't see the repos.
 
Old 10-09-2009, 03:31 AM   #4
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,330

Rep: Reputation: 227Reputation: 227Reputation: 227
IMHO red hat should really slow down on how fast they crank out fedora versions
 
Old 10-10-2009, 02:12 AM   #5
r3sistance
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Distribution: CentOS 5.4, Mac OS 10.4 (tiger)
Posts: 1,005

Rep: Reputation: 79
With Yum Upgrade, it's not hard to upgrade to the latest version and it's not like Fedora is Red Hat's Main product, to the Red Hat team Fedora would be more of a test bed platform but it's released as a Desktop Distribution for normal users. After all it's not like Red Hat charge for fedora so they aren't directly getting any money from it, Red Hat build RHEL off of Fedora however what is their main OS.
 
Old 10-10-2009, 10:12 AM   #6
lazlow
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,362

Rep: Reputation: 172Reputation: 172
Fedora has stuck to the same release schedule(more or less) since it was started(roughly every 6 months). However since Red Hat has turned the reins over to Fedora(just before the release of FC6) they have not had the discipline to clean up outstanding bugs. F7 was a landmark release that had tons of under the hood changes (that needed to be done), which by its very nature introduced a ton of bugs. Those bugs were acceptable considering the changes, but not going back and cleaning up the mess it created is not. There are still (F11) tons of outstanding bugs that trail back to the F7 release. RHEL6 was scheduled to be based on F9 (as RHEL4 was based on FC3 and RHEL5 on FC6) but F9 was too buggy (as was F10 and maybe even F11). Red Hat tried to explain it to Fedora politely by hiring more people than ever to work on Fedora (after the release of F9), but instead of keeping everyone working on bug cleanup, Fedora relocated resources (people) from bugs to development. When RH complained, Fedora went through the bug pile and declared all the bugs obsolete(even the ones that still had comments on the current release). This gave the appearance that all the bugs had been cleaned up, in reality all it did was give the bugs a newer file date. I think RH is pretty much stuck. It is pretty obvious that they would like to drop kick Fedora's leadership(of course they will not say this, at least not publicly), but that is really not possible(they handed the reins over). Fedora is a huge band name, so they are extremely reluctant to just cut it loose. If RHEL6 has to be pushed back yet another release(odds increase daily), it will be interesting to see how RH responds.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Firefox crashing frequently satimis Ubuntu 4 08-18-2006 12:57 PM
most-frequently-used flag lashgari Linux - General 3 06-22-2006 02:31 PM
comp hangs frequently venkatrao Linux - Hardware 1 07-07-2005 06:23 AM
Firefox Crashing Frequently flamesrock Linux - Software 2 11-21-2004 07:31 PM
Network services going down frequently Passive Linux - Networking 2 03-08-2002 05:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration