LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-19-2002, 09:46 PM   #31
jrdioko
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Posts: 944

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30

I did the exec sawfish and 'startx' and I got a grey screen with nothing at all on it, and some menus when you middle-click. This definitely is much different than windows and KDE like the page said, no little bar at the bottom .

I don't want to start yet another thread so I'll ask another question here (actually 2). Every once in a while, in KDE or Gnome or anywhere in Linux, I get two little bars underneith my mouse that follow it along. These are almost always never there in KDE, but in Sawfish now their always a part of the mouse. Are these video settings that I did wrong, or something else?

Second, how do I go about configuring my modem on Sawfish?

Thanks again,
JMagi
 
Old 10-19-2002, 09:54 PM   #32
jrdioko
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Posts: 944

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Ok, the Sawfish FAQ helped clear up a few questions. It said that Sawfish is only designed to be a window manager, not a desktop environment, so no background, no launching programs, unless something like Gnome is used (basically). I guess this isn't exactly what I'm looking for (although yes, it does run fine). Is there something inbetween sawfish and KDE? (e.g. at least a background for the desktop and more than 4 programs in the menu bar?)

Maybe I'm not understand the concept completely. Anyway if there are other window managers (with backgrounds, etc.) that arn't as processor intensive as KDE that I could play with, maybe you Gurus and LQ Addicts could recommend some (and where they can be found, of course!)

I'd appreciate it, thanks again,
JMagi
 
Old 10-20-2002, 12:50 AM   #33
jdc2048
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Distribution: Redhat, Gentoo, Solaris, HP-UX, etc...
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 30
Basically what you were trying to find out with the sawfish was that the X server or Window Manager were not eating up all the resources. If this proved to be true then there is a problem with KDE. If you found the system still unresponsive running simply sawfish and a terminal window, then you need to figure out what is causing that.

To me it sounds like you were happy with the performance of sawfish by itself?

If so, then you may want to see if gnome has the same problems as KDE.

If not, then you may want to look at a different window manager or even update your XFree86 installation.


On a side note, you can configure sawfish to automatically start other items such as the tool bar at the bottom of the screen. I believe you can also use the command "xsetroot" to change the background (if this is important to you). I have not actually gotten to that on my system yet as I am playing with RH 8 currently.

<RANT>
I like the idea of configuring my X session to only give me exactly what I need. Even though I have the horsepower (P4 1.5GHZ 384MB RAM) to run everything, I don't see any reason to.
</RANT>
 
Old 10-20-2002, 12:56 AM   #34
jrdioko
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Posts: 944

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I'd love to stay with KDE but it sounds like its too processor-intensive to work with my system. I was satisfied with the performance of sawfish, as far as speed, but I'd prefer something like KDE. Since we have determined that there is a problem with KDE, what else can I do/try?

-JMagi
 
Old 10-20-2002, 02:47 AM   #35
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
Honestly, XFCE. It's just about as user friendly as KDE, without all the bells and whistles that take up all your resources. Fluxbox is geared a little more towards intermediate users, but also is very easy to run.

But XFCE, check it out. The link is above, but I think it was www.xfce.org

Cool
 
Old 10-20-2002, 12:35 PM   #36
jrdioko
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Posts: 944

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I'll check those out, thanks.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE 3.3.2 Up and Running on 10.1 CE mac57 Mandriva 2 01-18-2005 04:55 PM
KDE 3.3.1 Not Running (FC3) Kenji Miyamoto Linux - Software 2 01-13-2005 02:07 AM
KDE 3.1 STILL not running in X... SlvrDakotaRT Linux - Newbie 2 02-06-2003 10:09 PM
KDE not running in X... please help! SlvrDakotaRT Linux - Newbie 5 02-06-2003 09:03 PM
which kde am i running ? sharky Linux - Software 5 10-20-2002 12:42 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration