LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2013, 03:43 PM   #16
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 6,027

Rep: Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623Reputation: 1623

Red Hat ask that you pay to use their OS. Red Hat do not explicitly say on their website "here you can download Red Hat Linux free and use it" therefore Red Hat themselves do not offer it free of charge.
The fact you can get it free, and licensing means it's not illegal, does not stop it being a paid for distro.
Want something to contrast it with? Look at Slackware which is entirely free but can also be bought.
Talking about grey areas of being able to obtain an unsupported .iso or a clone of the OS made by somebody else does not stop Red Hat from being commercial software for which they charge money.
https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/142303
There, no mention of "try it free".
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-16-2013, 04:35 PM   #17
paziulek
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: N.C.
Distribution: "gentoo|debian|arch"
Posts: 94

Rep: Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV View Post
not so
I had CentOS 5.9 installed on a Desktop from DELL bought in Jan 2001
512 meg ram (was 256 meg)
and it booted WAY faster than XP ( no service pack , SP1,SP2,or SP3 ) ever did
Gnome 2 was almost blindingly FAST
now large data sets with 512 meg , or firefox with only 512 ram . That was a bit slow .

but Gnome2 was fast
I agree here, only if the OP knows how optimize the boot process, including the services, of course, any Linux distro will be running smooth if you know what changes to make. But I kind of doubt the OP is able to do such tweaks at this moment of his/her Linux career. So, in my opinion, suggesting to load a hog, or rather mammoth on a poor, old PC, that will start kicking the swap the moment the login window appears, is a poor, unreasonable suggestion: redhat, centos and fedora... OP being a newbie, giving him a dinosaur to fit in a trunk of a Yugo - well, he will sooner or later say that Linux sucks... at least I would. A good piece advise is what OP is looking for... Tread him/her right... that's all.

btw: does CentOS come on CDs? - My P4 laptop had a CD-ROM... After downloading the 4.2GB image, burning, he might find out that all he has is a CD-ROM drive... I guess, he won't be happy.

Last edited by paziulek; 07-16-2013 at 04:40 PM.
 
Old 07-16-2013, 05:10 PM   #18
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 16,827

Rep: Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409Reputation: 2409
the mirror i like
http://mirrors.arsc.edu/centos/6/isos/i386/
has a live cd that can be installed and a minimal cd
CentOS-6.4-i386-LiveCD.iso
CentOS-6.4-i386-minimal.iso
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-17-2013, 05:16 AM   #19
gerhard.tinned
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Location: Vienna
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by lleb View Post
WRONG, their product is absolutely 100% free, their services on the other hand are not.

please be careful when you make false blanket statements like that.
That is not entirely true!

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux" is a based on open source but contains commercial software packages which are sold. The price is different depending on the version. https://www.redhat.com/wapps/store/catalog.html
"Fedora" is a free distribution. It is actually Red Hat as well as CentOS is but is it free of commercial software packages and therefore free. But Fedora is not located on the redhat website. It has its own website on http://fedoraproject.org/

Last edited by gerhard.tinned; 07-17-2013 at 05:26 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-17-2013, 05:18 AM   #20
gerhard.tinned
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Location: Vienna
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by paziulek View Post
btw: does CentOS come on CDs? - My P4 laptop had a CD-ROM... After downloading the 4.2GB image, burning, he might find out that all he has is a CD-ROM drive... I guess, he won't be happy.
The netinstall for example is a CD which boots a basic system for the installation and downloads all the packages during installation.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 05:57 AM   #21
maninani
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2013
Location: hyderbad
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Smile

ya thank u all for giving me such nice suggestions.. at last i want to install fedora 19 for my lap..

and such a nice community which is very helpful for like me.......

thanking u all once again..
 
Old 07-17-2013, 09:52 AM   #22
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US, Earth, end border$! ◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that works well on my cheapest, has been KDE or CLI but open... http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 3,110
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840
my easiest distro over the last few years, updates and all (or usb\other), was Ubuntu...☮

Last edited by jamison20000e; 07-17-2013 at 10:04 AM.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 11:20 AM   #23
seth68
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2013
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I've come back to Linux and found FC19 easy to install

Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV View Post
with Fedora being a Research and development operating system it too needs a lot of time and work and fixing
I felt I made the right choice, so far it out performs XP (which is the original O/S put in my PC).

I don't subscribe to any distro in particular but I tried Red Hat (>10 years ago), it initially put me off Linux all together but I've only, in the last week, installed Fedora 19 and it is brilliant.

To answer any query, I only chose Fedora because it was RH (or at least a derivative) and it was a 'flavour' of Linux that I had some exposure to (very little but enough to be the one to 'test drive') and so far I haven't wasted the 5+ minutes it takes to boot up XP when FC19 does it in just a touch over 1.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference in Redhat 9 and RHEL versions ! noony123 Linux - Newbie 1 11-22-2010 04:34 AM
Confused about Redhat versions gottaknow Red Hat 2 10-28-2007 12:11 PM
RedHat kernel versions emorrell Red Hat 2 04-30-2005 11:09 AM
kernel versions in Redhat 9 slogal Linux - Newbie 2 04-19-2005 07:55 AM
why there is different kernel versions from RedHat? linux_lover2005 Linux - Newbie 2 12-31-2004 09:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration