Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i'll just post my query here,since it deals with lvm and raid.I was planning to do the same thing for one of my linux media servers and do a raid then do lvm,the issue is i have 4 HDDS one is 20 GB(IDE) ( almost 8 yrs old ) and an 80 GB(IDE) + 2x1 TB SATA drives,will there be any performance issues here since the 20 GB one is 5200 RPM and rest are 7200 RPMS?
Hi kdelover, you should really have raised a seperate thread for a different query. But to answer your question, yes this is likely to cause issues since the drives in the raid won't be fully syncroised due to the different speeds of the disks. Else wise the disks will all have to drop to fastest speed of the lowest disk (5200 RPM) what would be overall the faster disks would lose performance. I'd advise generally building raids with same speed, same size disks if possible, speed is more important then size tho.
Running Linux software raid over LVM volumes is actually entirely possible, but makes no sense, since it offers no redundancy.
how could it offer no redundancy when you have two logical volumes always synchronized?. My problem is that i have one HDD on my machine and LINUX RHEL 5 designates it entirely as a VG (volume group), I honestly didn't know how shrink the VG and free some space so that I can create some other non-lvm partitions. So i am left with the option of creating logical volumes within the VG which I was wondering if I can implement RAID over them.
But yeah I'll research more on LVM raid capabilities.
A single disk raid is almost entirely pointless if that is what you are trying to achieve, you still have a single point of failure and you gain none of the performance increases that can come from using raid, about the only case this would help with is if a LVM corrupts but the most likely way a LVM would corrupt from is resizing and that's an action what is mirrored so... if this isn't what you are talking about then perhaps you would like to expand?